alexanderrevello commented on a change in pull request #759:
URL: https://github.com/apache/daffodil/pull/759#discussion_r812018751
##########
File path:
daffodil-runtime1/src/main/scala/org/apache/daffodil/dpath/DFDLXFunctions.scala
##########
@@ -185,7 +186,7 @@ case class DFDLXTrace(recipe: CompiledDPath, msg: String)
}
case other: DINode => other.namedQName.toString
}
- System.err.println("trace " + msg + ":" + nodeString)
+ Logger.log.trace(s"dfdlx:trace ${msg} : ${nodeString}")
Review comment:
I was under the impression that users would want to capture logged
information by itself using the log4j configuration, but if that is not the
case the level should be raised. Would it be too cost intensive to have an SDW
and a log4j info?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
