arosien commented on code in PR #253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/daffodil-vscode/pull/253#discussion_r955314011
##########
build.sbt:
##########
@@ -88,3 +90,183 @@ lazy val core = project
packageName := s"${name.value}-$daffodilVer"
)
.enablePlugins(commonPlugins: _*)
+ .dependsOn(sbtXjcProject)
+ .aggregate(sbtXjcProject)
+
+lazy val sbtXjcProject = project
+ .in(file("server/sbtXjc"))
+ .enablePlugins(SbtXjcPlugin)
+ .settings(
+ name := "daffodil-xjc",
+ libraryDependencies ++= Seq(
+ "javax.activation" % "activation" % "1.1.1",
+ "com.sun.xml.bind" % "jaxb-xjc" % "2.1.6"
+ // "org.relaxng" % "jing" % "20220510" % "runtime",
+
+ // "com.sun.istack" % "istack-commons-tools" % "4.1.1"
+ ),
+ xjcCommandLine += "-nv",
+ xjcCommandLine += "-p",
+ xjcCommandLine += "org.apache.daffodil.tdml",
+ xjcBindings += "bindings.xjb",
+ xjcJvmOpts += "-classpath",
+ xjcJvmOpts += Seq(
Review Comment:
Concern: it looks very suspicious that all of these runtime dependencies
have to be specified this way. What is requiring them, the XJC tool itself?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
