[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dave Thompson closed DAFFODIL-2632.
-----------------------------------
Verified the specified commit (commit df363367a689e11cb5b8d1277b5d24c912ebe2c8)
is included in the latest pull from the daffodil repository.
Verified, via review, changes identified in the commit comment was implemented.
Verified the affected daffodil subproject sbt test suite executed successfully
including the new test.
> NumberFormatException for blank dfdlx:repValues
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DAFFODIL-2632
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2632
> Project: Daffodil
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Back End
> Affects Versions: 3.2.1
> Reporter: Josh Adams
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.5.0
>
>
> As the title suggests, if a user forgets to add a value to a dfdlx:repValue,
> ie:
> <enumeration value="ENUM_VALUE" dfdlx:repValues=""/>
> It results in the following exception when the schema is compiled:
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> !! An unexpected exception occurred. This is a bug! !!
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> Please report this bug and help us fix it:
> https://daffodil.apache.org/community/#issue-tracker
> Please include the following exception, the command you
> ran, and any input, schema, or tdml files used that led
> to this bug.
> java.lang.NumberFormatException: Zero length BigInteger
> at java.base/java.math.BigInteger.<init>(BigInteger.java:484)
> at java.base/java.math.BigInteger.<init>(BigInteger.java:672)
> at
> org.apache.daffodil.dsom.HasRepValueAttributes.$anonfun$x$4$6(SimpleTypes.scala:90)
> at
> org.apache.daffodil.dsom.HasRepValueAttributes.$anonfun$x$4$6$adapted(SimpleTypes.scala:90)
> at scala.collection.TraversableLike.$anonfun$map$1(TraversableLike.scala:286)
> at scala.collection.IndexedSeqOptimized.foreach(IndexedSeqOptimized.scala:36)
> at scala.collection.IndexedSeqOptimized.foreach$(IndexedSeqOptimized.scala:33)
> at scala.collection.mutable.WrappedArray.foreach(WrappedArray.scala:38)
> at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map(TraversableLike.scala:286)
> at scala.collection.TraversableLike.map$(TraversableLike.scala:279)
> ......
> For reference, the enumeration was based on an xs:integer, but the same
> behavior occurred when using an xs:long as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
