stevedlawrence commented on code in PR #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/daffodil-sbt/pull/2#discussion_r1462478427
########## README.md: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +<!-- + Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with + this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. + The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 + (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with + the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + + http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + + Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + limitations under the License. +--> + +# Apache Daffodil SBT Plugin + +Plugin to enable Daffodil capabilities for DFDL schema projects. + +## Enable + +To enable the plugin, add the following to `project/plugins.sbt`: + +```scala +addSbtPlugin("org.apache.daffodil" % "sbt-daffodil" % "<version>") Review Comment: All sbt plugins have the naming convention of `sbt-foo` so I'm not sure we want to change the name here to "daffodil-sbt". But ASF requires that their repos start with the project name, so we can't name the repo "sbt-daffodil" like would be ideal. So the different in name/repo are because we're trying to follow two different conventions that we can't (and probably shouldn't) really change. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
