[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17907103#comment-17907103
]
Mike Beckerle commented on DAFFODIL-2936:
-----------------------------------------
I'm in favor of removing full validation and having use of xerces-J for
validation be done the same way one does schematron validation.
There is also need of a mode where validation errors cause failure, not by
escalating a validation error into a parse error, but by ending the parse by
checking for validation errors and failing at that point if there are any.
Also, there is a need for validation when unparsing. Unparsing is inherently
somewhat validating, but we also should check that values obey the facets,
counts obey min/max occurs constraints, etc.
> Validation Mode Enhancements
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: DAFFODIL-2936
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2936
> Project: Daffodil
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 3.9.0
> Reporter: Olabusayo Kilo
> Priority: Major
>
> Reference: DAFFODIL-2896
> In that ticket, we discuss some possible improvements to ValidationMode such
> as limited -> daffodil, deprecating full, allowing multiple validation modes
> etc.
> This ticket is intended to move the discussion and design of these validation
> mode enhancements.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
