kittimzhe opened a new pull request, #18704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler/pull/18704

   ## Was this PR generated or assisted by AI?
   
   YES — issue triage, root-cause analysis, fix and tests were developed with 
AI assistance (mechanism verified against the code and pinned by a red→green 
test below).
   
   ## Purpose of the pull request
   
   Fixes #18696. An HTTP task with method DELETE silently dropped the 
parameters configured under HTTP Parameters: `HttpTask#sendDeleteRequest` never 
collected the PARAMETER-typed entries, and the `OkHttpUtils.delete` overloads 
took no parameter map — so `DELETE /capture?existing=1` with a separate 
`jobId=42` parameter reached the server as `DELETE /capture?existing=1`, while 
GET sent the same parameter correctly.
   
   ## Brief change log
   
   - `OkHttpUtils`: add a `delete` overload accepting `Map<String, Object> 
requestParams`, appending them to the url through the same `addUrlParams` 
helper the GET path uses; the existing overloads delegate with `null` (behavior 
unchanged for other callers).
   - `HttpTask#sendDeleteRequest`: collect `getRequestParams()` and pass it to 
the new overload, mirroring `sendGetRequest`.
   
   ## Verify this pull request
   
   This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
   
   - `HttpTaskTest#testDeleteRequestSendsHttpParameterParamsAsQuery` — a DELETE 
task with a `${day}` PARAMETER entry (resolved to `20220812` via 
prepareParamsMap) records `GET /test?day=20220812`-style output: `DELETE` 
method with path `/test?day=20220812`. Fails on the pre-fix code (`expected: 
</test?day=20220812> but was: </test>`).
   - Full `HttpTaskTest`: 17/17 green with the fix (JDK 8, `mvn test -pl 
dolphinscheduler-task-plugin/dolphinscheduler-task-http -Dtest=HttpTaskTest`).
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to