EricGao888 commented on issue #10976: URL: https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler/issues/10976#issuecomment-1193234105
> > > > What about using `TestNG`? > > > > > > > > > This may need to refactor all test code, if we want to use `TestNG` to replace Junit > > > > > > @ruanwenjun Yes. At this moment, I think we have about 4 people, me and my colleagues who will work on the UT refactoring. It is possible for us to refactor all test code and fix all related style / formatting issues. The question lying between choosing `TestNG` and `jUnit` is whether it is necessary to replace one with another. So far, I've found some advantages of `TestNG` over `jUnit`: > > > > * `TestNG` supports running UT in parallelism. > > * `TestNG` supports `testing group`. > > * `TestNG` supports an easier way to pass data into testing method using `Data Provider`. > > * `TestNG` supports `Dependency Test`. > > * `TestNG` supports `Parameterization` through `xml` configuration. > > > > Some related materials: > > > > * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWXWQE4pL_0 > > * https://www.guru99.com/junit-vs-testng.html > > > > Although `TestNG` is more powerful, it seems that it is not a `must` to switch `jUnit` to `TestNG` 🤣 > > WDYT? > > AFAIK, Junit5+ can support these features. @ruanwenjun Sounds good to me. I will take this issue. I found a post about differences between `jUnit4` and `jUnit5`, as well as how to migrate: https://blogs.oracle.com/javamagazine/post/migrating-from-junit-4-to-junit-5-important-differences-and-benefits -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
