ruanwenjun commented on code in PR #11682:
URL: https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler/pull/11682#discussion_r959659510


##########
dolphinscheduler-api/src/main/java/org/apache/dolphinscheduler/api/service/impl/ProcessDefinitionServiceImpl.java:
##########
@@ -698,6 +699,43 @@ public Map<String, Object> 
verifyProcessDefinitionName(User loginUser, long proj
         return result;
     }
 
+    @Override
+    public Map<String, Object> batchDeleteProcessDefinitionByCodes(User 
loginUser,
+                                                                   long 
projectCode,
+                                                                   String 
codes){
+        Map<String, Object> result = new HashMap<>();
+        Set<String> deleteFailedCodeSet = new HashSet<>();
+        if (!StringUtils.isEmpty(codes)) {
+            String[] processDefinitionCodeArray = codes.split(",");
+            for (String strProcessDefinitionCode : processDefinitionCodeArray) 
{
+                long code = Long.parseLong(strProcessDefinitionCode);
+                ProcessDefinition processDefinition = 
processDefinitionMapper.queryByCode(code);
+                // check workflow exists, avoid null exception
+                if (processDefinition == null || projectCode != 
processDefinition.getProjectCode()) {
+                    
deleteFailedCodeSet.add(MessageFormat.format(Status.PROCESS_DEFINE_NOT_EXIST.getMsg(),
 String.valueOf(code)));
+                    continue;
+                }
+                try {
+                    Map<String, Object> deleteResult = 
this.deleteProcessDefinitionByCode(loginUser, projectCode, code);
+                    if 
(!Status.SUCCESS.equals(deleteResult.get(Constants.STATUS))) {
+                        String errorMsg = 
MessageFormat.format(Status.DELETE_PROCESS_DEFINE_BY_CODES_ERROR.getMsg(), 
processDefinition.getName(), deleteResult.get(Constants.MSG));
+                        deleteFailedCodeSet.add(errorMsg);
+                        logger.error(errorMsg);
+                    }
+                } catch (Exception e) {
+                    
deleteFailedCodeSet.add(MessageFormat.format(Status.DELETE_PROCESS_DEFINE_BY_CODES_ERROR.getMsg(),
 processDefinition.getName(), e.getMessage()));
+                }
+            }
+        }
+
+        if (!deleteFailedCodeSet.isEmpty()) {
+            putMsg(result, Status.BATCH_DELETE_PROCESS_DEFINE_BY_CODES_ERROR, 
"\n " + String.join("\n ", deleteFailedCodeSet));

Review Comment:
   No, the interface need to receive code. But we need to return process name 
in UI, since the processCode is not friendly to user, but if someone use 
openAPI, it's better to return code, since process name is not friendly for 
openAPI.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to