ruanwenjun commented on code in PR #11682:
URL: https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler/pull/11682#discussion_r959659510
##########
dolphinscheduler-api/src/main/java/org/apache/dolphinscheduler/api/service/impl/ProcessDefinitionServiceImpl.java:
##########
@@ -698,6 +699,43 @@ public Map<String, Object>
verifyProcessDefinitionName(User loginUser, long proj
return result;
}
+ @Override
+ public Map<String, Object> batchDeleteProcessDefinitionByCodes(User
loginUser,
+ long
projectCode,
+ String
codes){
+ Map<String, Object> result = new HashMap<>();
+ Set<String> deleteFailedCodeSet = new HashSet<>();
+ if (!StringUtils.isEmpty(codes)) {
+ String[] processDefinitionCodeArray = codes.split(",");
+ for (String strProcessDefinitionCode : processDefinitionCodeArray)
{
+ long code = Long.parseLong(strProcessDefinitionCode);
+ ProcessDefinition processDefinition =
processDefinitionMapper.queryByCode(code);
+ // check workflow exists, avoid null exception
+ if (processDefinition == null || projectCode !=
processDefinition.getProjectCode()) {
+
deleteFailedCodeSet.add(MessageFormat.format(Status.PROCESS_DEFINE_NOT_EXIST.getMsg(),
String.valueOf(code)));
+ continue;
+ }
+ try {
+ Map<String, Object> deleteResult =
this.deleteProcessDefinitionByCode(loginUser, projectCode, code);
+ if
(!Status.SUCCESS.equals(deleteResult.get(Constants.STATUS))) {
+ String errorMsg =
MessageFormat.format(Status.DELETE_PROCESS_DEFINE_BY_CODES_ERROR.getMsg(),
processDefinition.getName(), deleteResult.get(Constants.MSG));
+ deleteFailedCodeSet.add(errorMsg);
+ logger.error(errorMsg);
+ }
+ } catch (Exception e) {
+
deleteFailedCodeSet.add(MessageFormat.format(Status.DELETE_PROCESS_DEFINE_BY_CODES_ERROR.getMsg(),
processDefinition.getName(), e.getMessage()));
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!deleteFailedCodeSet.isEmpty()) {
+ putMsg(result, Status.BATCH_DELETE_PROCESS_DEFINE_BY_CODES_ERROR,
"\n " + String.join("\n ", deleteFailedCodeSet));
Review Comment:
No, the interface need to receive code. But we need to return process name
in UI, since the processCode is not friendly to user, but if someone use
openAPI, it's better to return code, since process name is not friendly for
openAPI.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]