duspring opened a new issue, #13141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler/issues/13141

   ### Search before asking
   
   - [X] I had searched in the 
[issues](https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler/issues?q=is%3Aissue) and 
found no similar issues.
   
   
   ### What happened
   
   When executing sh bin/stop all In sh, the master/worker node has no DingDing 
alarm. It has been tested before that V3.1.0 service stop can send an alarm. I 
don't know why
   
   ### What you expected to happen
   
   When executing sh bin/stop all In sh, the master/worker node can receive the 
DingDing alarm, similar to the previous: [{"type": "MASTER", "host": 
"/nodes/master/ip: port", "event": "SERVER_DOWN", "warningLevel": "SERIOUS"}] 
data quality alarm
   
   ### How to reproduce
   
   After configuring alarms and establishing DingDing alarm groups, execute sh 
bin/stop all When sh is selected, check whether the master/worker node can 
receive the DingDing alarm, similar to the previous one:
   The format of master alarm is as follows:
   [{"type": "MASTER", "host": "/nodes/master/ip: port", "event": 
"SERVER_DOWN", "warningLevel": "SERIOUS"}] Data quality alarm
   The worker alarm is as follows:
   [{"type": "WORKER", "host": "/nodes/worker/default/192.168.10.1:1234", 
"event": "SERVER_DOWN", "warningLevel": "SERIOUS"}] Data quality alarm
   
   ### Anything else
   
   My Zookeeper version uses 3.8.0. The master/worker node has been registered 
normally
   
   ### Version
   
   3.1.x
   
   ### Are you willing to submit PR?
   
   - [ ] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
   
   ### Code of Conduct
   
   - [X] I agree to follow this project's [Code of 
Conduct](https://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to