foxtail463 opened a new pull request, #61345:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/61345

   compensation with DNF implication
   
   The old residual compensation simply checks whether the query residual set 
contains all view residual predicates. This breaks on real-world MV rewrites 
where query and view residuals are structurally different but logically 
implicative -- e.g. query residual
     A OR (B AND C)
   vs view residual
     A OR B
   The old code sees two different expression trees and bails out, even though 
the query side is strictly stronger.
   
   This patch introduces DNF-based implication checking (impliesByDnf) to 
replace the set-containment approach, so compensation succeeds whenever the 
query candidates logically imply the view residual regardless of structural 
differences. A hard cap (MAX_DNF_BRANCHES=1024) guards against exponential 
expansion; when the proof is too expensive the compensation fails 
conservatively rather than hanging the optimizer.
   
   The three separate compensate calls in AbstractMaterializedViewRule are 
collapsed into a single Predicates.compensatePredicates entry point that 
encapsulates candidate collection and residual finalization.
   
   ### What problem does this PR solve?
   
   Issue Number: close #xxx
   
   Related PR: #xxx
   
   Problem Summary:
   
   ### Release note
   
   None
   
   ### Check List (For Author)
   
   - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
       - [ ] Regression test
       - [ ] Unit Test
       - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
       - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
           - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
           - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
           - [ ] No code files have been changed.
           - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason?  -->
   
   - Behavior changed:
       - [ ] No.
       - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
   
   - Does this need documentation?
       - [ ] No.
       - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: 
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
   
   ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
   
   - [ ] Confirm the release note
   - [ ] Confirm test cases
   - [ ] Confirm document
   - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should 
merge into -->
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to