github-actions[bot] commented on code in PR #63055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/63055#discussion_r3200035282


##########
be/src/exec/operator/data_queue.cpp:
##########
@@ -29,38 +29,28 @@
 namespace doris {
 
 void SubQueue::try_pop(std::unique_ptr<Block>* output_block) {
-    bool need_notify_sink_ready = false;
-    {
-        LockGuard l(queue_lock);
-        if (!blocks.empty()) {
-            *output_block = std::move(blocks.front());
-            blocks.pop_front();
-            bytes_in_queue -= (*output_block)->allocated_bytes();
-            blocks_in_queue -= 1;
-            need_notify_sink_ready = blocks.empty();
+    LockGuard l(queue_lock);
+    if (!blocks.empty()) {
+        *output_block = std::move(blocks.front());
+        blocks.pop_front();
+        bytes_in_queue -= (*output_block)->allocated_bytes();
+        blocks_in_queue -= 1;
+        if (blocks.empty()) {
+            sink_dependency->set_ready();
         }

Review Comment:
   This reintroduces dependency notification while `queue_lock` is held. 
`Dependency::set_ready()` takes `_task_lock` and wakes blocked tasks, and the 
same hunk now also calls `sink_dependency->block()` under `queue_lock` in 
`try_push()`. The previous code explicitly deferred both calls until after 
releasing `queue_lock` to avoid nested locks, and `clear_blocks()` still 
follows that pattern. Please keep the boolean flag approach and call dependency 
methods after `queue_lock` is released; otherwise source/sink pipeline tasks 
can hit lock-order stalls or deadlock when a woken task re-enters this queue 
path.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to