github-actions[bot] commented on code in PR #65121:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/65121#discussion_r3518059639


##########
.github/workflows/code-checks.yml:
##########
@@ -17,7 +17,12 @@
 
 name: Code Checks
 
-on: [push, pull_request_target]
+on:
+  push:
+    branches:
+      - master
+      - branch-*

Review Comment:
   `branch-*` is still broad enough to include ordinary upstream development 
heads, so it leaves the duplicate push+PR workflow runs this PR is trying to 
avoid. Live branch metadata currently has unprotected matches such as 
`branch-catalog-spi`, `branch-fs-spi`, `branch-hudi-mtmv`, 
`branch-refactor_property`, and `branch-4.1-fix-spill`; pushing to any of those 
with an open PR would still trigger both the `push` run here and the 
`pull_request_target` run. Please restrict this to the actual long-lived 
release branches that should keep push CI, or add explicit exclusions for 
branch-named feature heads.



##########
.github/workflows/lfs-warning.yml:
##########
@@ -18,7 +18,12 @@
 ---
 name: 'Check Large File'
 
-on: [push, pull_request_target]
+on:
+  push:
+    branches:
+      - master
+      - branch-*

Review Comment:
   Same issue as in `code-checks.yml`: `branch-*` still matches branch-named 
upstream development heads such as `branch-catalog-spi`, `branch-fs-spi`, 
`branch-hudi-mtmv`, `branch-refactor_property`, and `branch-4.1-fix-spill`. 
Those pushes would continue to run this workflow in addition to the 
`pull_request_target` run for an open PR, so the push filter should be narrowed 
to the intended long-lived release branches or explicitly exclude branch-named 
feature heads.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to