starocean999 opened a new pull request, #67154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/67154
### What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
Nereids' default DECIMALV3 precision promotion
(`ComputeSignatureHelper.defaultDecimalV3PrecisionPromotion`) recursively
collects every
DECIMALV3 found in the argument types, computes a single global "wider"
type, and then
replaces ALL decimal slots with that one type via
`TypeCoercionUtils.replaceDecimalV3WithTarget`.
For `MAP<K, V>` where K and V are independent type variables with different
precision/scale, merging them into one wider type breaks correctness in two
ways
(they share the same type-derivation path):
1. `MAP_KEYS` (and other map consumers) silently turns legal keys into NULL.
Repro: a `MAP<DECIMAL(76,0), DECIMAL(76,18)>` built from a 76-digit
integral key
and `0.125000000000000000`. Widening the key slot to scale 18 overflows
the big
integral key, so `MAP_KEYS` returns `[null]` instead of the key.
2. `UNNEST(MAP)` (rewritten to `EXPLODE_MAP`) fails type analysis. The
promoted MAP
argument type no longer matches the original input MAP type.
Fix: promote each decimal slot independently instead of merging them. Each
slot
(MAP key/value, ARRAY item, scalar) keeps its own precision/scale derived
from its
own argument type; the wider type is only used for NULL-typed slots and the
placeholder return type. Vararg slots keep the previous behavior to avoid
changing
vararg decimal functions (e.g. `field`).
None
### Check List (For Author)
- Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
- [ ] Regression test
- [ ] Unit Test
- [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
- [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
- [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
- [ ] No code files have been changed.
- [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? -->
- Behavior changed:
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
- Does this need documentation?
- [ ] No.
- [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg:
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
- [ ] Confirm the release note
- [ ] Confirm test cases
- [ ] Confirm document
- [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should
merge into -->
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]