Mryange opened a new pull request, #67738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/67738

   
   
    Recursive CTE queries could fail with `Fragment context ... not found` 
during recursive fragment cleanup. The FE collected recursive child fragments 
through a shared plan tree and could generate duplicate reset entries for the 
same fragment on the same BE. The first `WAIT_FOR_DESTROY` request removed the 
BE fragment context, while the duplicate request then failed to find it. This 
change deduplicates reset entries by fragment ID and BE address while 
preserving entries for different BEs.
   ### Release note
   
   None
   
   ### Check List (For Author)
   
   - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->
       - [ ] Regression test
       - [ ] Unit Test
       - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
       - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
           - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
           - [ ] Previous test can cover this change.
           - [ ] No code files have been changed.
           - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason?  -->
   
   - Behavior changed:
       - [ ] No.
       - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change -->
   
   - Does this need documentation?
       - [ ] No.
       - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: 
https://github.com/apache/doris-website/pull/1214 -->
   
   ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)
   
   - [ ] Confirm the release note
   - [ ] Confirm test cases
   - [ ] Confirm document
   - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should 
merge into -->
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to