github-actions[bot] commented on code in PR #67917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/67917#discussion_r4000900770


##########
fe/fe-core/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/indexpolicy/IndexPolicy.java:
##########
@@ -129,8 +129,13 @@ public List<String> getShowInfo() {
             ImmutableSet.of("common_grams");
 
     public boolean isInvalid() {
-        return type == IndexPolicyTypeEnum.TOKEN_FILTER
+        boolean hasUnsupportedTokenFilter = type == 
IndexPolicyTypeEnum.TOKEN_FILTER
                 && properties != null
                 && 
LEGACY_UNSUPPORTED_TOKEN_FILTER_TYPES.contains(properties.get(PROP_TYPE));
+        boolean hasInvalidNgramTokenizer = type == 
IndexPolicyTypeEnum.TOKENIZER
+                && properties != null
+                && "ngram".equals(properties.get(PROP_TYPE))
+                && !NGramTokenizerValidator.isValidPolicy(properties);

Review Comment:
   [P1] Preserve n-gram policies that were valid before upgrade
   
   This applies the new 1024 cap retroactively to replayed policies. In the 
base code, a persisted tokenizer such as `min_gram=2048,max_gram=2048` passes 
both FE and BE (the difference is 0), and its tokenizer buffer is only `4 * 
2048 + 1024` `UChar32` slots, about 36 KiB. During the supported BE-first 
rolling upgrade, new BEs start rejecting analyzer reconstruction for that 
existing policy; after FE upgrade, this line also marks it invalid and 
`validateAnalyzerExists` rejects every dependent analyzer, so existing indexes 
become unusable solely because of the upgrade. This is distinct from the 
existing absolute-allocation thread, which concerns bounding newly admitted 
pathological values. Please grandfather or migrate policies that were valid 
under the previous rules (with a matching BE reconstruction path), and add an 
image/edit-log upgrade test for an existing analyzer/index above 1024.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to