924060929 commented on PR #67417:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/67417#issuecomment-5658673713

   <!-- doris-repo-review:v1:begin -->
   ### Local pipeline review — ✅ PASS
   
   ```yaml
   schema: doris-repo-review/v1
   status: PASS
   pr: apache/doris#67417
   commit: 2bf22bf8f36762fcce30316919c4ceee98a46820
   base: 80ff138cfa1532240c119a75a659fd6b2aaa1616
   reviewed_at: 2026-09-14T11:43+08:00
   reviewer: 924060929
   model: gpt-6-astra
   effort: xhigh
   findings: {blocker: 0, major: 0, minor: 1, nit: 0}
   rounds: 1
   converged: true
   ```
   
   **Notes for maintainers**
   
   - 
`fe/fe-core/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/datasource/metacache/MetaCache.java:217`
 — Minor: the PR body still describes an earlier first-caller/one-load-lock 
contract. Please describe current-generation retry and per-generation 
ownership, and bind validation claims to the tested commit.
   - 
`fe/fe-core/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/datasource/metacache/MetaCache.java:274`
 — The two-load bound includes retired remote calls: if both remain hung, new 
misses fail explicitly until a slot exits. This is a work bound, not remote 
cancellation or guaranteed progress.
   - This was a read-only source/dependency review, including the latest 
forced-refresh and filtered CREATE_DATABASE regressions. No build, test, 
live-cluster or CI/merge validation was performed by this review.
   
   <sub>Reviewed locally with the `doris-repo-review` pipeline. Repository 
policy may accept this receipt for the matching commit; it is not a human 
Apache approval.</sub>
   <!-- doris-repo-review:v1:end -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to