eldenmoon commented on PR #68198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/68198#issuecomment-5747570456

   <!-- doris-repo-review:v1:begin -->
   ### Local pipeline review — ✅ PASS
   
   ```yaml
   schema: doris-repo-review/v1
   status: PASS
   pr: apache/doris#68198
   commit: 56c2d553e6864c95c4f3a12180ad5ef5990a9e28
   base: 934233d8160e8bdfeb9f511f4453b36231880049
   reviewed_at: 2026-09-20T12:16+08:00
   reviewer: eldenmoon
   model: gpt-6-astra
   effort: xhigh
   findings: {blocker: 0, major: 0, minor: 0, nit: 0}
   rounds: 1
   converged: true
   ```
   
   **Notes for maintainers**
   
   - Static source review only: all 66 changed files covered by three qualified 
reviewers, with independent lead verification; no builds, tests, cluster, 
performance, or live rolling-upgrade/downgrade validation was run.
   - `be/src/storage/segment/segment.cpp:962` and 
`be/src/service/point_query_executor.cpp:606` — missing physical columns retain 
requested-column defaults; point-query schema sourcing predates this PR. 
Existing review threads were not duplicated.
   - `be/src/storage/rowset/rowset_meta.cpp:251` and 
`be/src/storage/segment/variant/variant_compaction_paths.h:32` — the moved 
VARIANT layout was already nonpersistent; local/cloud and horizontal/vertical 
reader/writer handoffs were traced. No new on-disk or FE/BE wire-format 
incompatibility was found.
   - `be/CMakeLists.txt:206` — checked-in NestedGroup routing was reviewed, but 
the out-of-tree feature module was not; the legacy V1/V2 compaction fixture was 
inspected but not executed.
   - `be/test/storage/compaction/segcompaction_test.cpp:391` — the existing 
sleep-based test-flakiness discussion (discussion_r4046293607) remains a known 
limitation, not a newly counted finding.
   
   <sub>Reviewed locally with the `doris-repo-review` pipeline. Repository 
policy may accept this receipt for the matching commit; it is not a human 
Apache approval.</sub>
   <!-- doris-repo-review:v1:end -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to