u70b3 commented on code in PR #67978:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/67978#discussion_r4140778573
##########
fe/fe-core/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/datasource/lance/job/LanceIndexJobManager.java:
##########
@@ -596,6 +633,32 @@ private static boolean hasFenceIdentity(LanceIndexJob job)
{
&& job.getNormalizedIndexName() != null;
}
+ /**
+ * True when the durable record carries the complete target identity the
+ * dispatcher needs to address a job: catalog, database, table, normalized
+ * locator, and the index/mutation identity. This is the eligibility of a
+ * PENDING job for dispatch; the dispatch quad (backend id, BE process
+ * epoch, dispatch revision, invocation id) does not exist before
+ * {@code markRunning} and is not required here. Corrupt identity-less
+ * records are never dispatchable.
+ */
+ private static boolean hasDispatchTarget(LanceIndexJob job) {
+ return job.getProvider() != null && job.getNormalizedLocator() != null
+ && job.getNormalizedIndexName() != null &&
job.getDisplayIndexName() != null
+ && job.getDbName() != null && job.getTableName() != null
+ && job.getMutationType() != null && job.getCatalogId() > 0;
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * True when the record additionally carries the full dispatch quad
recorded
+ * by {@code markRunning}. The possible-live sweep requires the quad: only
+ * with it can {@code recordTerminationProof} address and release the slot.
+ */
+ private static boolean hasDispatchIdentity(LanceIndexJob job) {
+ return hasDispatchTarget(job) && job.getBackendId() != null &&
job.getBeProcessEpoch() != null
Review Comment:
done, the sweep filter now requires exactly the fields
recordTerminationProof matches on (backend id, epoch, invocation id; the
dispatch revision falls back to the record revision and is backfilled after
matching), so a legacy or target-field-less slot holder stays sweepable while
the capacity counter keeps charging it (be18079497).
##########
fe/fe-core/src/main/java/org/apache/doris/datasource/lance/job/LanceIndexJobDispatcher.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,657 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+// distributed with this work for additional information
+// regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+// with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+// software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+// KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
+// specific language governing permissions and limitations
+// under the License.
+
+package org.apache.doris.datasource.lance.job;
+
+import org.apache.doris.catalog.Env;
+import org.apache.doris.common.ClientPool;
+import org.apache.doris.common.Config;
+import org.apache.doris.common.util.MasterDaemon;
+import org.apache.doris.datasource.CatalogIf;
+import org.apache.doris.datasource.lance.LanceExternalCatalog;
+import org.apache.doris.datasource.lance.storage.LanceStorageOptions;
+import org.apache.doris.persist.gson.GsonUtils;
+import org.apache.doris.system.Backend;
+import org.apache.doris.system.BeSelectionPolicy;
+import org.apache.doris.system.SystemInfoService;
+import org.apache.doris.thrift.BackendService;
+import org.apache.doris.thrift.TLanceIndexJobDispatch;
+import org.apache.doris.thrift.TLanceIndexMutationType;
+import org.apache.doris.thrift.TNetworkAddress;
+import org.apache.doris.thrift.TStatus;
+import org.apache.doris.thrift.TStatusCode;
+
+import org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager;
+import org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger;
+import org.apache.thrift.TApplicationException;
+
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Locale;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.UUID;
+import java.util.function.Supplier;
+
+/**
+ * Master-only daemon that drives the durable Lance index job records through
+ * the lifecycle after admission. Each round runs in a fixed order: converge
+ * expired RUNNING jobs to UNKNOWN, release possible-live slots whose backend
+ * process was replaced, drive the refresh a terminal job still owes, then
+ * dispatch PENDING jobs. Every durable transition goes through
+ * {@link LanceIndexJobManager} under its own lock; the daemon holds no catalog
+ * or manager lock across any call.
+ *
+ * <p>The daemon does not read the admission gate: a job that is already
durable
+ * must be driven to its terminal state, whatever the gate says now, so the
+ * thread runs unconditionally on the master and simply finds nothing to do
+ * while no jobs exist. An idle round writes no journal record.
+ *
+ * <p>Dispatch follows the durable-before-send boundary: the whole request is
+ * prepared first (so a preparation failure just leaves the job PENDING), then
+ * the markRunning edit log is written and re-read before the first byte of
+ * network I/O, and the invocation id of an attempt that lost the
compare-and-set
+ * is never reused. After a successful markRunning there is exactly one send;
+ * from that point a job converges only through a matching result callback, the
+ * deadline sweep, or the epoch sweep, never through a resend. A failure that
+ * still proves the dispatch was never enqueued (a clean pre-enqueue error
+ * status, a client-pool borrow failure, or an UNKNOWN_METHOD answer from an
+ * old backend) converges it NOT_COMMITTED through the no-enqueue channel,
+ * which releases the possible-live slot in the same durable transition;
+ * anything ambiguous after the invocation may have started converges UNKNOWN
+ * with the slot retained.
+ *
+ * <p>The manager is resolved from the supplier once per round rather than
+ * captured at construction: {@code Env.loadLanceIndexJobManager} replaces the
+ * Env-owned manager with a brand-new object on every image load, so a cached
+ * reference would keep scanning the abandoned pre-image manager after an FE
+ * restart while replay, admission and SHOW all move on to the restored one.
+ * Every phase of one round shares the single resolved instance.
+ *
+ * <p>The sleep between rounds is sliced at {@link #MAX_SLEEP_SLICE_MS} so a
+ * shortened polling interval takes effect within one slice (see the field
+ * javadoc), and {@link Config#lance_index_job_dispatcher_paused} suspends only
+ * the dispatch phase (see {@link #dispatchPendingJobs}).
+ */
+public class LanceIndexJobDispatcher extends MasterDaemon {
+ private static final Logger LOG =
LogManager.getLogger(LanceIndexJobDispatcher.class);
+
+ /**
+ * Upper bound of one sleep slice, equal to the shipped default interval.
The
+ * daemon never sleeps longer than this, so a shortened
+ * {@link Config#lance_index_job_dispatch_interval_second} takes effect
within
+ * one slice instead of waiting out a previously adopted long sleep: the
+ * elapsed check in {@link #runAfterCatalogReady} is re-evaluated against
the
+ * current config at every wake. Slices bound only the sleep; rounds still
+ * honor the configured interval, because a wake whose configured interval
+ * (longer than this bound) has not elapsed since the last round skips the
+ * round. A lengthened interval takes effect at the next wake through the
same
+ * check, and an interval at or below this bound needs no check at all —
every
+ * wake runs a round, exactly one per configured period.
+ */
+ private static final long MAX_SLEEP_SLICE_MS = 10_000L;
+
+ private final Supplier<LanceIndexJobManager> jobManagerSupplier;
+
+ /** Wall time of the last executed round, or -1 before the first one. */
+ private long lastRoundMs = -1L;
+
+ public LanceIndexJobDispatcher(LanceIndexJobManager jobManager) {
+ this(() -> jobManager);
+ }
+
+ public LanceIndexJobDispatcher(Supplier<LanceIndexJobManager>
jobManagerSupplier) {
+ super("lance index job dispatcher", dispatchIntervalMs());
+ this.jobManagerSupplier = jobManagerSupplier;
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Values loaded from fe.conf bypass the config validator (only ADMIN SET
runs
+ * it), so the positive invariant is re-asserted where a non-positive value
+ * would break the loop: a non-positive interval would kill this thread
inside
+ * {@code Thread.sleep} or busy-spin it, a non-positive deadline would
sweep
+ * every dispatched job UNKNOWN on the next round, and a zero cap would
stall
+ * dispatch forever. The refresh retry interval needs no such defense: a
+ * non-positive value simply disengages the throttle.
+ */
+ private static long dispatchIntervalMs() {
+ return Math.max(1, Config.lance_index_job_dispatch_interval_second) *
1000L;
+ }
+
+ private static long executeDeadlineMs(long nowMs) {
+ long second = Math.max(1L,
Config.lance_index_job_execute_deadline_second);
+ return second > (Long.MAX_VALUE - nowMs) / 1000L ? Long.MAX_VALUE :
nowMs + second * 1000L;
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ protected void runAfterCatalogReady() {
+ if (!Env.getCurrentEnv().isMaster()) {
+ return;
+ }
+ if (Env.isCheckpointThread()) {
+ return;
+ }
+ long configuredMs = dispatchIntervalMs();
+ setInterval(Math.min(configuredMs, MAX_SLEEP_SLICE_MS));
+ if (configuredMs > MAX_SLEEP_SLICE_MS && lastRoundMs >= 0 && nowMs() -
lastRoundMs < configuredMs) {
+ // A wake inside a long configured interval: the slice elapsed, the
+ // round period has not. Skipping is cheap and writes no journal
record.
+ return;
+ }
+ lastRoundMs = nowMs();
+ try {
+ runOneRound(jobManagerSupplier.get());
+ } catch (Throwable t) {
+ LOG.warn("Failed to process one round of the lance index job
dispatcher", t);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /** Clock seam for the round-period check; tests advance it instead of
sleeping. */
+ protected long nowMs() {
+ return System.currentTimeMillis();
+ }
+
+ private void runOneRound(LanceIndexJobManager jobManager) {
+ long nowMs = System.currentTimeMillis();
+ sweepExpiredRunningJobs(jobManager, nowMs);
+ sweepReplacedProcessEpochs(jobManager);
+ driveRequiredRefreshes(jobManager, nowMs);
+ dispatchPendingJobs(jobManager);
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Deadline sweep. A RUNNING job past its wait deadline has produced no
+ * complete trusted result, so it converges to UNKNOWN through the same
+ * completeWithResult channel a callback would use. Expiry bounds the wait
+ * only: it never proves termination, so the possible-live slot, the
+ * same-name fence, and the unresolved quota all stay held.
+ */
+ private void sweepExpiredRunningJobs(LanceIndexJobManager jobManager, long
nowMs) {
+ for (LanceIndexJob job : jobManager.getExpiredRunningJobs(nowMs)) {
+ try {
+ boolean completed =
jobManager.completeWithResult(job.getJobId(),
+ dispatchRevisionOf(job), job.getInvocationId(),
job.getBeProcessEpoch(),
+ new
LanceIndexJobResult(LanceIndexJobResultCode.NO_TRUSTED_RESULT,
+ LanceIndexJobCompletionReason.NONE,
+ "execute deadline expired without a complete
trusted result", false));
+ if (completed) {
+ LOG.info("lance index job {} converged RUNNING -> UNKNOWN
on deadline expiry",
+ job.getJobId());
+ } else {
+ LOG.warn("deadline sweep skipped lance index job {}:
already converged by a callback or sweep",
+ job.getJobId());
+ }
+ } catch (Throwable t) {
+ LOG.warn("failed to sweep expired lance index job " +
job.getJobId(), t);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Possible-live sweep. The only slot-release proof this daemon produces is
+ * that the recorded backend process epoch no longer exists: a backend
entry
+ * reporting a different epoch proves the process that received the
dispatch
+ * was replaced. A missing backend entry or heartbeat loss proves nothing
+ * (the worker may still be running behind a partition), so such a job
keeps
+ * its slot until a stronger proof or an operator force release. An epoch
+ * change also proves nothing about the outcome, so the mutation state is
+ * never touched here.
+ */
+ private void sweepReplacedProcessEpochs(LanceIndexJobManager jobManager) {
+ for (LanceIndexJob job : jobManager.getJobsHoldingPossibleLiveSlot()) {
+ try {
+ Backend backend =
Env.getCurrentSystemInfo().getBackend(job.getBackendId());
+ if (backend == null || backend.getProcessEpoch() ==
job.getBeProcessEpoch()) {
+ continue;
+ }
+ boolean recorded =
jobManager.recordTerminationProof(job.getJobId(),
+ dispatchRevisionOf(job), job.getBackendId(),
job.getBeProcessEpoch(),
+ job.getInvocationId(),
LanceIndexTerminationProof.BE_PROCESS_EPOCH_GONE);
+ if (recorded) {
+ LOG.info("released possible-live slot of lance index job
{}: backend process epoch was replaced",
+ job.getJobId());
+ } else {
+ LOG.warn("epoch sweep skipped lance index job {}: dispatch
identity already moved",
+ job.getJobId());
+ }
+ } catch (Throwable t) {
+ LOG.warn("failed to sweep possible-live slot of lance index
job " + job.getJobId(), t);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Refresh driver for terminal jobs with an unfinished refresh obligation.
+ * Completing the refresh is the protocol duty that releases the same-name
+ * fence and the unresolved quota once DONE; it is not a read-visibility
+ * action, because index metadata is never cached. Each job is driven
+ * through markRefreshRunning, the idempotent external-table refresh, then
+ * DONE or FAILED: a FAILED job keeps its fence and is retried, throttled
to
+ * one attempt per retry interval, while a first REQUIRED refresh is never
+ * delayed. UNKNOWN jobs never appear here; they owe no refresh.
+ */
+ private void driveRequiredRefreshes(LanceIndexJobManager jobManager, long
nowMs) {
+ for (LanceIndexJob job : jobManager.getJobsNeedingRefresh()) {
+ try {
+ if (job.getRefreshState() ==
LanceIndexJobRefreshState.RUNNING) {
+ // In flight elsewhere; the master-transfer sweep
downgrades a stale
+ // RUNNING back to REQUIRED, so a lost driver cannot
strand it.
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (job.getRefreshState() == LanceIndexJobRefreshState.FAILED
+ && nowMs - job.getUpdateTimeMs()
+ < Config.lance_index_job_refresh_retry_second
* 1000L) {
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (!jobManager.markRefreshRunning(job.getJobId(),
job.getRevision())) {
+ // A concurrent driver won the compare-and-set; nothing to
do here.
+ continue;
+ }
+ driveOneRefresh(jobManager, job);
+ } catch (Throwable t) {
+ LOG.warn("failed to drive the refresh of lance index job " +
job.getJobId(), t);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ private void driveOneRefresh(LanceIndexJobManager jobManager,
LanceIndexJob job) {
+ long refreshRevision = job.getRevision() + 1;
+ CatalogIf catalog =
Env.getCurrentEnv().getCatalogMgr().getCatalog(job.getCatalogId());
+ if (catalog == null) {
+ // Unreachable while the unresolved-job guard blocks catalog
drops; kept as a
+ // fail-closed fallback so the job still transitions and retries
later.
+ LOG.warn("catalog of lance index job {} is gone; marking its
refresh FAILED", job.getJobId());
+ finishRefreshTransition(jobManager, job.getJobId(),
refreshRevision, false);
+ return;
+ }
+ try {
+ // A half-orphan target (its db or table already dropped
externally) is a
+ // silent no-op: nothing is left to invalidate, and DONE is the
correct end
+ // state for the job.
+
Env.getCurrentEnv().getRefreshManager().handleRefreshTable(catalog.getName(),
+ job.getDbName(), job.getTableName(), true);
+ } catch (Throwable t) {
+ // The typed DdlException is the expected failure; an unchecked
exception out
+ // of the metadata path must still leave the durable refresh
state, or the
+ // job would strand in refresh RUNNING until the next master
transfer.
+ LOG.warn("refresh of lance index job {} failed; keeping the fence
for a retry",
+ job.getJobId(), t);
+ finishRefreshTransition(jobManager, job.getJobId(),
refreshRevision, false);
+ return;
+ }
+ finishRefreshTransition(jobManager, job.getJobId(), refreshRevision,
true);
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Applies the DONE/FAILED transition with a bounded revision retry. A
concurrent
+ * termination-proof write can bump the revision after markRefreshRunning
succeeded,
+ * and silently losing that compare-and-set would leave the refresh
RUNNING — a
+ * state only the master-transfer sweep downgrades. Re-reading the
revision and
+ * retrying a few times converges it; a persistent loss is escalated.
+ */
+ private void finishRefreshTransition(LanceIndexJobManager jobManager, long
jobId, long expectedRevision,
+ boolean done) {
+ long revision = expectedRevision;
+ for (int attempt = 0; attempt < 3; attempt++) {
+ boolean transitioned = done ? jobManager.markRefreshDone(jobId,
revision)
+ : jobManager.markRefreshFailed(jobId, revision);
+ if (transitioned) {
+ return;
+ }
+ LanceIndexJob fresh = jobManager.getJob(jobId);
+ if (fresh == null) {
+ break;
+ }
+ revision = fresh.getRevision();
+ }
+ LOG.error("lance index job {} kept its refresh RUNNING: the
DONE/FAILED transition kept losing the"
+ + " compare-and-set; the master-transfer sweep will downgrade
it", jobId);
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * PENDING dispatch. Makes at most
+ * {@link Config#lance_index_job_max_dispatch_per_round} fresh dispatches
per
+ * round, and only a job this round actually made RUNNING consumes that
+ * budget: skipped jobs (an eligibility gate is closed, or every backend is
+ * at capacity) are scanned past, so a stable subset of permanently
+ * undispatchable jobs can never crowd out later ids. Per backend it never
+ * exceeds {@link Config#lance_index_job_max_inflight_per_backend}
+ * possible-live worker slots, counted from slot ownership (see
+ * {@link LanceIndexJobManager#countPossibleLiveSlotsByBackend()}) plus the
+ * jobs this round already made RUNNING. A job that cannot be dispatched
+ * keeps waiting as PENDING: there is no dispatch-exhaustion terminal state
+ * and no backoff beyond the daemon period.
+ *
+ * <p>{@link Config#lance_index_job_dispatcher_paused} suspends this phase
+ * only — the sweeps and the refresh driver keep running while it is set.
+ * The switch is checked at the phase entry and again before every single
+ * job attempt, which closes the admission race a test or operator cares
+ * about: anyone who sets the switch <em>before</em> admitting a job is
+ * guaranteed the job is never dispatched while paused. A round whose
+ * snapshot was taken before the admission never sees the job at all, and
+ * any round that can see it performs its per-job check after the
+ * admission, hence after the switch was set, and skips it. A skipped job
+ * never consumes the round's dispatch budget.
+ */
+ private void dispatchPendingJobs(LanceIndexJobManager jobManager) {
+ if (Config.lance_index_job_dispatcher_paused) {
+ return;
+ }
+ int maxPerRound = Math.max(1,
Config.lance_index_job_max_dispatch_per_round);
+ Map<Long, Integer> inflightByBackend =
jobManager.countPossibleLiveSlotsByBackend();
+ int dispatched = 0;
+ for (LanceIndexJob job : jobManager.getJobsNeedingDispatch()) {
+ if (Config.lance_index_job_dispatcher_paused) {
+ // Flipped mid-round: stop without touching the budget.
+ break;
+ }
+ if (dispatched >= maxPerRound) {
+ break;
+ }
+ try {
+ if (tryDispatch(jobManager, job, inflightByBackend)) {
+ dispatched++;
+ }
+ } catch (Throwable t) {
+ LOG.warn("failed to dispatch lance index job " +
job.getJobId(), t);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * One dispatch attempt for one PENDING job; returns true only when the
+ * attempt made the job durable RUNNING (and so consumes this round's
+ * dispatch budget). Every early return before markRunning leaves the job
+ * PENDING for a later round: the eligibility gates, the backend and
+ * capacity checks, and also the whole request preparation — storage-option
+ * resolution and the wire request build run before the durable boundary,
+ * so an FE-side failure there (for example a catalog id that resolves to
+ * nothing while ALTER CATALOG RENAME has the catalog temporarily removed)
+ * just retries next round instead of stranding the job UNKNOWN without a
+ * single byte sent. Once markRunning succeeds the job is durable RUNNING
+ * and this invocation id gets exactly one send attempt; after that only a
+ * matching callback, the deadline sweep, or the epoch sweep can converge
+ * the job.
+ */
+ private boolean tryDispatch(LanceIndexJobManager jobManager, LanceIndexJob
job,
+ Map<Long, Integer> inflightByBackend) {
+ boolean localDataset = isLocalFileDataset(job.getNormalizedLocator());
+ if (localDataset && !Config.enable_lance_index_local_file_mutation) {
+ // Operator assertion is off: a local-filesystem mutation stays
PENDING.
+ return false;
+ }
+ if (localDataset && Env.getCurrentEnv().getFrontends(null).size() !=
1) {
+ // Local files are only shared by a single-node deployment.
+ return false;
+ }
+ SystemInfoService systemInfo = Env.getCurrentSystemInfo();
+ // All schedule-available backends, shuffled by the selection policy:
the
+ // first one with a free possible-live slot takes the job, so a full
+ // backend defers this attempt only when every selectable backend is at
+ // the cap, never just because the randomly picked one is.
+ List<Long> backendIds = systemInfo.selectBackendIdsByPolicy(
+ new
BeSelectionPolicy.Builder().needScheduleAvailable().build(), -1);
+ int perBackendCap = Math.max(1,
Config.lance_index_job_max_inflight_per_backend);
+ Backend backend = null;
+ for (Long backendId : backendIds) {
+ Backend candidate = systemInfo.getBackend(backendId);
+ if (candidate == null) {
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (localDataset && !isOnlyAliveBackend(systemInfo,
candidate.getId())) {
+ continue;
+ }
+ Integer inflight = inflightByBackend.get(candidate.getId());
+ if (inflight != null && inflight >= perBackendCap) {
+ continue;
+ }
+ backend = candidate;
+ break;
+ }
+ if (backend == null) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ String invocationId = UUID.randomUUID().toString();
+ // The process epoch is captured once, and the same value goes to the
+ // durable record and the wire: a heartbeat landing between the two
reads
+ // must not split the dispatch identity (the callback matches the
durable
+ // value, and the epoch sweep releases the slot against it).
+ long beProcessEpoch = backend.getProcessEpoch();
+ long deadlineMs = executeDeadlineMs(System.currentTimeMillis());
+ long expectedDispatchRevision = job.getRevision() + 1;
+ TLanceIndexJobDispatch dispatch;
+ try {
+ dispatch = buildDispatch(job, expectedDispatchRevision,
invocationId, deadlineMs, beProcessEpoch,
+ resolveStorageOptions(job));
+ } catch (Exception e) {
+ // Not a trusted worker rejection and not an ambiguity either:
nothing was
+ // marked and nothing was sent, so the job simply waits for the
next round.
+ LOG.warn("failed to prepare the dispatch of lance index job {};
staying PENDING: {}",
+ job.getJobId(), e.getMessage());
+ return false;
+ }
+ if (!jobManager.markRunning(job.getJobId(), job.getRevision(),
backend.getId(),
+ beProcessEpoch, invocationId, deadlineMs)) {
+ // The compare-and-set lost: this attempt's dispatch identity is
void and its
+ // invocation id is discarded. A fresh identity is built from
scratch next round.
+ return false;
+ }
+ inflightByBackend.merge(backend.getId(), 1, Integer::sum);
+ LanceIndexJob fresh = jobManager.getJob(job.getJobId());
+ if (!Env.getCurrentEnv().isMaster() || fresh == null
+ || fresh.getMutationState() !=
LanceIndexJobMutationState.RUNNING
+ || fresh.getDispatchRevision() == null
+ || fresh.getDispatchRevision() != expectedDispatchRevision
+ || !invocationId.equals(fresh.getInvocationId())) {
+ // The recheck failed right before the send: no send, and no
resend either.
+ // The job is durable RUNNING, so the deadline sweep or a matching
callback
+ // converges it.
+ LOG.warn("lance index job {} did not survive the pre-send recheck;
not sending", job.getJobId());
+ return true;
+ }
+ TStatus status;
+ try {
+ status = sendExecuteRequest(backend, dispatch);
+ } catch (PreInvocationSendException e) {
+ // Proven never enqueued: converge through the no-enqueue channel,
which
+ // releases the possible-live slot this attempt took with
markRunning in
+ // the same durable transition.
+ LOG.warn("dispatch of lance index job {} provably never enqueued:
{}", job.getJobId(), e.getMessage());
+ completePreInvocationRejected(jobManager, fresh, e.getMessage());
+ return true;
+ } catch (Exception e) {
+ // The request may have reached the backend, so its outcome cannot
be trusted.
+ LOG.warn("dispatch send of lance index job {} failed: {}",
job.getJobId(), e.getMessage());
+ completeNoTrusted(jobManager, fresh, "dispatch send failed; the
result cannot be trusted");
+ return true;
+ }
+ if (status == null || status.getStatusCode() == null) {
+ // Absence of a status is the absence of a trusted answer, not a
clean
+ // rejection; only a complete error status proves the dispatch was
not
+ // enqueued.
+ LOG.warn("dispatch send of lance index job {} returned no status",
job.getJobId());
+ completeNoTrusted(jobManager, fresh, "dispatch send returned no
status");
+ return true;
+ }
+ if (status.getStatusCode() != TStatusCode.OK) {
+ // A clean error status proves the backend did not enqueue the
dispatch, so
+ // this invocation is known never to have executed.
+ LOG.warn("backend {} rejected the dispatch of lance index job {}
before enqueueing",
+ backend.getId(), job.getJobId());
+ completePreInvocationRejected(jobManager, fresh,
Review Comment:
done, the bounded TStatusCode name now travels into both the log line and
the persisted reason, so SHOW can tell an unavailable worker
(NOT_IMPLEMENTED_ERROR) from a resource rejection; raw backend messages stay
out unless sanitized (bff67bf4d8).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
