cecemei commented on code in PR #18262:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/18262#discussion_r2223565817
##########
processing/src/main/java/org/apache/druid/data/input/impl/AggregateProjectionSpec.java:
##########
@@ -175,8 +174,8 @@ public String toString()
private static ProjectionOrdering computeOrdering(VirtualColumns
virtualColumns, List<DimensionSchema> groupingColumns)
{
if (groupingColumns.isEmpty()) {
- // call it time ordered, there is no grouping columns so there is only 1
row for this projection
- return new ProjectionOrdering(Cursors.ascendingTimeOrder(), null);
+ // no ordering since there is only 1 row for this projection
+ return new ProjectionOrdering(List.of(), null);
Review Comment:
I see, would it be better if we have some backdoor to ignore time ordering
in the query, if that's the only ordering, since the granularity is already
checked later?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
