abhishekrb19 commented on code in PR #18329: URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/18329#discussion_r2301994557
########## processing/src/main/java/org/apache/druid/query/QueryContexts.java: ########## @@ -137,6 +137,9 @@ public class QueryContexts public static final String NATIVE_QUERY_SQL_PLANNING_MODE_COUPLED = "COUPLED"; public static final String NATIVE_QUERY_SQL_PLANNING_MODE_DECOUPLED = "DECOUPLED"; + public static final String REALTIME_SEGMENTS_ONLY = "realtimeSegmentsOnly"; Review Comment: >I'm not sure if "query" prefix is needed. Since it's already part of the query context I think that's clear enough Ah yes, agreed, "query" does seem redundant. I was suggesting "data" mostly because realtime data captures both in-memory rows and incrementally persisted segments -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
