FrankChen021 commented on issue #20224: URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/issues/20224#issuecomment-5503369156
If we take it as a S3-compatible object storage and use the S3 interface to access OZone, I think the implementation should be much simpler as we have standard S3 and Aliabab Cloud OSS supported already, we can copy code and small dependencies changes( I guess maybe current s3 object storage can also be used to access OZone via S3) But, using S3 interface to access OZone might bring performance problems if the QPS at object storage is high, and the s3g might be a bottleneck. We have seen in this many OZone application cases. So from the performance perspective, I would prefer its hadoop client interfaces, no S3 involved. I didn't explore the native API of OZone, not sure if they share SAME APIs with HDFS, but I think if possible, the OZone support can be also provided in a dedicated extension -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
