justinborromeo commented on a change in pull request #7133: 6088 - Time 
Ordering On Scans
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/pull/7133#discussion_r267846001
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
processing/src/main/java/org/apache/druid/query/scan/ScanQueryRunnerFactory.java
 ##########
 @@ -68,34 +81,117 @@ public ScanQueryRunnerFactory(
   )
   {
     // in single thread and in jetty thread instead of processing thread
-    return new QueryRunner<ScanResultValue>()
-    {
-      @Override
-      public Sequence<ScanResultValue> run(
-          final QueryPlus<ScanResultValue> queryPlus, final Map<String, 
Object> responseContext
-      )
-      {
-        // Note: this variable is effective only when queryContext has a 
timeout.
-        // See the comment of CTX_TIMEOUT_AT.
-        final long timeoutAt = System.currentTimeMillis() + 
QueryContexts.getTimeout(queryPlus.getQuery());
-        responseContext.put(CTX_TIMEOUT_AT, timeoutAt);
+    return (queryPlus, responseContext) -> {
+      ScanQuery query = (ScanQuery) queryPlus.getQuery();
+      int numSegments = 0;
+      final Iterator<QueryRunner<ScanResultValue>> segmentIt = 
queryRunners.iterator();
+      for (; segmentIt.hasNext(); numSegments++) {
+        segmentIt.next();
+      }
+      // Note: this variable is effective only when queryContext has a timeout.
+      // See the comment of CTX_TIMEOUT_AT.
+      final long timeoutAt = System.currentTimeMillis() + 
QueryContexts.getTimeout(queryPlus.getQuery());
+      responseContext.put(CTX_TIMEOUT_AT, timeoutAt);
+      if (query.getOrder().equals(ScanQuery.Order.NONE)) {
+        // Use normal strategy
         return Sequences.concat(
             Sequences.map(
                 Sequences.simple(queryRunners),
-                new Function<QueryRunner<ScanResultValue>, 
Sequence<ScanResultValue>>()
-                {
-                  @Override
-                  public Sequence<ScanResultValue> apply(final 
QueryRunner<ScanResultValue> input)
-                  {
-                    return input.run(queryPlus, responseContext);
-                  }
-                }
+                input -> input.run(queryPlus, responseContext)
             )
         );
+      } else if (query.getLimit() <= 
scanQueryConfig.getMaxRowsQueuedForTimeOrdering()) {
+        // Use priority queue strategy
+        return sortAndLimitScanResultValues(
+            Sequences.concat(Sequences.map(
+                Sequences.simple(queryRunners),
+                input -> input.run(queryPlus, responseContext)
+            )),
+            query
+        );
+      } else if (numSegments <= 
scanQueryConfig.getMaxSegmentsTimeOrderedInMemory()) {
 
 Review comment:
   Since you only need files for a single segment open at one time, the segment 
limit should really be a partition limit, right?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to