lrosenman opened a new issue #9212: azure extensions: task log kill crashes 
with "Not Implemented".
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/issues/9212
 
 
   Please provide a detailed title (e.g. "Broker crashes when using TopN query 
with Bound filter" instead of just "Broker crashes").
   
   ### Affected Version
   0.16.0-incubating
   
   ### Description
   I have a small 3-master, 2-query, 2-storage node cluster and need to be able 
to shrink the druid_tasks table.  
   
   I added the following to my overlord configuration:
   `   # remove old logs
       druid.indexer.logs.kill.enabled=true
       # after: (in ms).
       # 14 days * 24 hours * 60 minutes * 60 seconds * 1000 ms
       druid.indexer.logs.kill.durationToRetain=1209600000`
   
   and when the kill task ran, I got:
   
   > 2020-01-17T22:04:38,578 ERROR [Overlord-Helper-Manager-Exec--0] 
org.apache.druid.indexing.overlord.helpers.TaskLogAutoCleaner - Failed to 
clean-up the task logs
   java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: not implemented
           at 
org.apache.druid.storage.azure.AzureTaskLogs.killOlderThan(AzureTaskLogs.java:159)
 ~[?:?]
           at 
org.apache.druid.indexing.overlord.helpers.TaskLogAutoCleaner$1.run(TaskLogAutoCleaner.java:75)
 [druid-indexing-service-0.16.0-incubating.jar:0.16.0-incubating]
           at 
org.apache.druid.java.util.common.concurrent.ScheduledExecutors$1.call(ScheduledExecutors.java:55)
 [druid-core-0.16.0-incubating.jar:0.16.0-incubating]
           at 
org.apache.druid.java.util.common.concurrent.ScheduledExecutors$1.call(ScheduledExecutors.java:51)
 [druid-core-0.16.0-incubating.jar:0.16.0-incubating]
           at 
org.apache.druid.java.util.common.concurrent.ScheduledExecutors$2.run(ScheduledExecutors.java:92)
 [druid-core-0.16.0-incubating.jar:0.16.0-incubating]
           at 
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) 
[?:1.8.0_232]
           at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) 
[?:1.8.0_232]
           at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
 [?:1.8.0_232]
           at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
 [?:1.8.0_232]
           at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) 
[?:1.8.0_232]
           at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) 
[?:1.8.0_232]
           at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) [?:1.8.0_232]
   
   Is there a plan to implement this?
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to