suneet-s commented on a change in pull request #9893:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/9893#discussion_r428846660



##########
File path: sql/src/test/java/org/apache/druid/sql/calcite/CalciteQueryTest.java
##########
@@ -7300,6 +7301,74 @@ public void testRegexpExtract() throws Exception
     );
   }
 
+  @Test
+  public void testRegexpExtractFilterViaNotNullCheck() throws Exception
+  {
+    // Cannot vectorize due to extractionFn in dimension spec.
+    cannotVectorize();
+
+    testQuery(
+        "SELECT COUNT(*)\n"
+        + "FROM foo\n"
+        + "WHERE REGEXP_EXTRACT(dim1, '^1') IS NOT NULL OR REGEXP_EXTRACT('Z' 
|| dim1, '^Z2') IS NOT NULL",
+        ImmutableList.of(
+            Druids.newTimeseriesQueryBuilder()
+                  .dataSource(CalciteTests.DATASOURCE1)
+                  .intervals(querySegmentSpec(Filtration.eternity()))
+                  .granularity(Granularities.ALL)
+                  .virtualColumns(
+                      expressionVirtualColumn("v0", 
"regexp_extract(concat('Z',\"dim1\"),'^Z2')", ValueType.STRING)
+                  )
+                  .filters(
+                      or(
+                          not(selector("dim1", null, new 
RegexDimExtractionFn("^1", 0, true, null))),
+                          not(selector("v0", null, null))
+                      )
+                  )
+                  .aggregators(new CountAggregatorFactory("a0"))
+                  .context(TIMESERIES_CONTEXT_DEFAULT)
+                  .build()
+        ),
+        ImmutableList.of(
+            new Object[]{3L}
+        )
+    );
+  }
+
+  @Test
+  public void testRegexpLikeFilter() throws Exception
+  {
+    // Cannot vectorize due to usage of regex filter.
+    cannotVectorize();
+
+    testQuery(
+        "SELECT COUNT(*)\n"
+        + "FROM foo\n"
+        + "WHERE REGEXP_LIKE(dim1, '^1') OR REGEXP_LIKE('Z' || dim1, '^Z2')",

Review comment:
       Sounds good to me!
   
   > I could see having a systematic way to test for this (a query generator, 
maybe) but I don't think adding one just for this function would make sense.
   
   I've been working on the beginnings of a query generator to match all the 
different rows in `druid.foo` table - I was kinda sneakily hoping there was 
already a systematic way we add tests for all these different conditions and I 
just hadn't seen it yet :)




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@druid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@druid.apache.org

Reply via email to