suneet-s commented on issue #11173:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/issues/11173#issuecomment-828912883


   +1 on the approach and the config names. I'm also in favor of more granular 
controls per table instead of an overall config that applies to all the tables 
as the growth rate per table can be very different depending on the use case. 
This approach will allow a cluster admin to decide on the best config for their 
use case.
   
   When implementing this, we should verify that Druid has the correct indexes 
for each config so that deleting these entities does not become a bottleneck


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to