jihoonson commented on pull request #11163: URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/11163#issuecomment-829885074
@asdf2014 I'm not saying we should not accept this. I'm saying this doesn't seem the right process. Have you read the [ASF IP clearance doc](https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/)? The IP clearance is not just about the license. All codes in the ASF projects are owned by the ASF and the IP clearance process is required to make this part clear. The IP clearance doc explicitly says > This is for projects and PMCs that have already been created and are receiving a code donation into an existing codebase. Any code that was developed outside of the ASF SVN repository and our public mailing lists must be processed like this, even if the external developer is already an ASF committer. I think we should revert this PR and go through the IP clearance process because this was developed outside of ASF. Please go back to the dev thread for this issue and add more details there (not here) for people like me who don't know much about the helm chart such as - What is the current status of the project? - Does it reflect the most recent release of Druid? - How is it being tested? - Why is it best to host the helm chart in the druid repo? What alternatives have you considered? - After migration, what is your plan for automatic testing? I don't think this is an exhaustive list. Please add details as much as possible. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
