cryptoe commented on PR #15090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/15090#issuecomment-1771211179

   @dulu98Kurz Thank you for the patience. Since most of the committers are 
busy with druid 28 things there might be some delay. 
   
   I think we have a ugly fail safe here. What I would prefer is to change the 
exception message to something nicer so that the user does not need to read 
through the druid's code base. 
   
   Like @abhishekagarwal87 32K partitions per interval just seem to massive and 
is generally an issue where in either compaction is lagging behind or late data 
is coming. 
   If we change this variable to int, the ticking time bomb has a larger impact 
and can lead to a full cluster outage where the number of segments in the 
cluster balloons up in millions.
   
   I think we we do want to change this to INT, we should add a guard rail to 
the number of partitions per interval from the implicit 32K to something larger 
maybe 50K ? 
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to