johnImply commented on issue #16957: URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/issues/16957#issuecomment-2465133812
I can't comment on the proper coding design here ... however from a user perspective, if Druid is simply looking at the name of the column to determine if it should be interpreted as a timestamp ... ... then how about any column with the name beginning with the two underscores '__' be considered a timestamp? ... and if there is concern that other columns beginning with '__' might already exist in the schema, then add a property e.g. druid.timestampDataTypePrefix that allows you to specify what prefix should be interpreted as timestamp datatype. Thanks. John -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
