Author: marrs
Date: Wed Mar  4 18:52:20 2015
New Revision: 1664113

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1664113
Log:
Small changes to the shell tutorial.

Modified:
    
felix/site/trunk/content/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-dependency-manager-4/tutorials/getting-started.mdtext
    
felix/site/trunk/content/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-dependency-manager-4/tutorials/leveraging-the-shell.mdtext

Modified: 
felix/site/trunk/content/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-dependency-manager-4/tutorials/getting-started.mdtext
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/site/trunk/content/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-dependency-manager-4/tutorials/getting-started.mdtext?rev=1664113&r1=1664112&r2=1664113&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- 
felix/site/trunk/content/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-dependency-manager-4/tutorials/getting-started.mdtext
 (original)
+++ 
felix/site/trunk/content/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-dependency-manager-4/tutorials/getting-started.mdtext
 Wed Mar  4 18:52:20 2015
@@ -11,9 +11,11 @@ When using the dependency manager, your
 
 The following paragraphs will show various examples that explain how to do 
this. Subsequently, some more advanced scenarios will be covered that involve 
listening to dependency and component state changes and interacting with the 
OSGi framework from within your component implementation.
 
+To use the dependency manager, you should put the 
`org.apache.felix.dependencymanager.jar` in your classpath while compiling and 
in your OSGi framework when running.
+
 ### Registering a service
 
-The first example is about registering a service. We extend 
`DependencyActivatorBase` and in the init method we use the reference to the 
`DependencyManager` to create and add a component. For this component we 
subsequently set its service interface and implementation. In this case the 
interface is the `Store` interface, the second parameter, null, allows you to 
provide properties along with the service registration. For the implementation, 
we only mention the `Class` of the implementation, which means the dependency 
manager will lazily instantiate it. In this case, there is not much point in 
doing that because the component has no dependencies, but if it had, the 
instantiation would only happen when those dependencies were resolved.
+The first example is about registering a service. We extend 
`DependencyActivatorBase` and in the `init` method we use the reference to the 
`DependencyManager` to create and add a component. For this component we 
subsequently set its service interface and implementation. In this case the 
interface is the `Store` interface, the second parameter, `null`, allows you to 
provide properties along with the service registration. For the implementation, 
we only mention the `Class` of the implementation, which means the dependency 
manager will lazily instantiate it. In this case, there is not much point in 
doing that because the component has no dependencies, but if it had, the 
instantiation would only happen when those dependencies were resolved.
 
 Notice that the dependency manager API uses method chaining to create a more 
or less "fluent" API that, with proper indentation, is very easy to read.
 
@@ -25,8 +27,6 @@ Notice that the dependency manager API u
                 .setImplementation(MemoryStore.class)
             );
         }
-        
-        public void destroy(BundleContext context, DependencyManager manager) 
throws Exception {}
     }
 
 
@@ -74,8 +74,6 @@ Our second example is that of a componen
                 )
             );
         }
-        
-        public void destroy(BundleContext context, DependencyManager manager) 
throws Exception {}
     }
 
 
@@ -113,8 +111,6 @@ Sometimes, simply injecting services doe
                 )
             );
         }
-        
-        public void destroy(BundleContext context, DependencyManager manager) 
throws Exception {}
     }
 
 
@@ -167,8 +163,6 @@ Not all dependencies are on services. Th
                 )
             );
         }
-        
-        public void destroy(BundleContext context, DependencyManager manager) 
throws Exception {}
     }
 
 

Modified: 
felix/site/trunk/content/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-dependency-manager-4/tutorials/leveraging-the-shell.mdtext
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/felix/site/trunk/content/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-dependency-manager-4/tutorials/leveraging-the-shell.mdtext?rev=1664113&r1=1664112&r2=1664113&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- 
felix/site/trunk/content/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-dependency-manager-4/tutorials/leveraging-the-shell.mdtext
 (original)
+++ 
felix/site/trunk/content/documentation/subprojects/apache-felix-dependency-manager-4/tutorials/leveraging-the-shell.mdtext
 Wed Mar  4 18:52:20 2015
@@ -15,11 +15,18 @@ Typing help ```help dm``` in the gogo sh
              stats, stat, st   Displays components statistics
              wtf               Detects where are the root failures
           options:
-             bundleIds, bid, bi, b <List of bundle ids or bundle symbolic 
names to display (comma separated)> [optional]
-             componentIds, cid, ci <List of component identifiers to display 
(comma separated)> [optional]
-             components, c <Regex(s) used to filter on component 
implementation class names (comma separated), can be negated using "!" prefix> 
[optional]
-             services, s <OSGi filter used to filter some service properties> 
[optional]
-             top <Max number of top components to display (0=all)> This 
command displays components callbacks (init/start) times> [optional]
+             bundleIds, bid, bi, b <List of bundle ids or bundle symbolic
+                 names to display (comma separated)> [optional]
+             componentIds, cid, ci <List of component identifiers to display
+                 (comma separated)> [optional]
+             components, c <Regex(s) used to filter on component
+                 implementation class names (comma separated), can be
+                 negated using "!" prefix> [optional]
+             services, s <OSGi filter used to filter some service 
+                 properties> [optional]
+             top <Max number of top components to display (0=all)> This
+                 command displays components callbacks (init/start)
+                 times> [optional]
           parameters:
              CommandSession  
 
@@ -30,7 +37,7 @@ __List all dependency manager components
 
 ```dm```
 
-Sample output
+Sample output:
 
        [9] dm.demo
         [6] dm.demo.Probe(type=radiation) unregistered
@@ -70,23 +77,23 @@ __Find all components for a given classn
 
 ```dm c .*ProbeImpl```
 
-dm c or components finds all components for which the classname of the 
implementation matches the regular expression.
+`dm c` or `components` finds all components for which the classname of the 
implementation matches the regular expression.
 
 __Find all services matching a service filter__
 
 ```dm s "(type=temperature)"```
 
-dm s allows finding components based on the service properties of their 
registered services in the service registry using a standard OSGi service 
filter.
+`dm s` allows finding components based on the service properties of their 
registered services in the service registry using a standard OSGi service 
filter.
 
 __Find out why components are not registered__
 
 ```dm wtf```
 
-Sample output
+Sample output:
 
        2 missing dependencies found.
        -----------------------------
        The following service(s) are missing: 
         * dm.demo.Sensor is not found in the service registry
 
-wtf gives the root cause for components not being registered and therefore 
their services not being available. In a typical application components have 
dependencies on services implemented by components that have dependencies on 
services etcetera. This transitivity means that an entire chain of components 
could be unregistered due to a (few) root dependencies not being satisified. 
wtf is about discovering those dependencies.
\ No newline at end of file
+`wtf` gives the root cause for components not being registered and therefore 
their services not being available. In a typical application components have 
dependencies on services implemented by components that have dependencies on 
services etcetera. This transitivity means that an entire chain of components 
could be unregistered due to a (few) root dependencies not being satisfied. 
`wtf` is about discovering those dependencies.
\ No newline at end of file


Reply via email to