Github user angelboxes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/465#discussion_r207364751
--- Diff:
fineract-provider/src/main/java/org/apache/fineract/portfolio/loanproduct/domain/LoanProduct.java
---
@@ -102,6 +103,10 @@
@JoinTable(name = "m_product_loan_charge", joinColumns =
@JoinColumn(name = "product_loan_id"), inverseJoinColumns = @JoinColumn(name =
"charge_id"))
private List<Charge> charges;
+ @ManyToMany(fetch = FetchType.EAGER)
+ @JoinTable(name = "m_product_loan_rate", joinColumns =
@JoinColumn(name = "product_loan_id"), inverseJoinColumns = @JoinColumn(name =
"rate_id"))
--- End diff --
It should be ManyToMany as we use a third table to join the rate and
loan_product tables in the same way that the charges and loan_products are
joined. About the fetch type Lazy I guess it should work the same but I will
do some tests to be sure.
---
