ptuomola commented on pull request #812: URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/812#issuecomment-633274494
Looks good to me - all makes sense As an aside, I was wondering about the (existing logic) in vetoJobExecution - i.e. why is it needed i the first place. But reading through the code it seems that Fineract has implemented its own scheduler "from scratch" and is using Quartz just to give a regular trigger to execute its own scheduler logic? That's very interesting - why not just use the scheduling logic provided by Quartz directly? But anyway - not related to this PR... ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
