a7med3del1973 commented on code in PR #4385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/4385#discussion_r1972484855


##########
fineract-provider/src/test/java/org/apache/fineract/infrastructure/security/utils/LogParameterEscapeUtilTest.java:
##########
@@ -43,9 +46,33 @@ public LogParameterEscapeUtilTest() {
         Then("The log message stays as it is", () -> {
             assertEquals(logParameter, escapedLogParameter);
         });
+
         Then("The escape util changes the special characters to `_`", () -> {
             assertEquals("This String contains new line_, carriage return_ and 
tab_ characters.", escapedLogParameter);
         });
     }
 
+    // Additional JUnit 5 Test Cases
+    @Test
+    void testEscapeLogParameter_withNullInput() {
+        assertEquals(null, LogParameterEscapeUtil.escapeLogParameter(null));
+    }
+
+    @Test

Review Comment:
   > Honestly, I'm not sure if it's okay to have both Cucumber tests and JUnit 
tests in the same place.
   
   Thanks for review.. you are right it should be the same for the best 
practices.
   Changes done.. waiting your review.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to