This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
cdutz pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-blazeds.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 895277c - Got a first working version of sub-crux instances in
modules working - Implemented a first working UI for the heating system
895277c is described below
commit 895277c20ab4a170d598796e74c761ded3d89373
Author: Christofer Dutz <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Sun Sep 27 18:38:34 2020 +0200
- Got a first working version of sub-crux instances in modules working
- Implemented a first working UI for the heating system
---
core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommand.java | 2 +-
core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommandExt.java | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommand.java
b/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommand.java
index f29fca7..3e05991 100644
--- a/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommand.java
+++ b/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommand.java
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ public interface LoginCommand
* The gateway calls this method to perform programmatic authorization.
* <p>
* A typical implementation would simply iterate over the supplied roles
and
- * check that atleast one of the roles returned true from a call to
+ * check that at least one of the roles returned true from a call to
* HttpServletRequest.isUserInRole(String role).
* </p>
*
diff --git a/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommandExt.java
b/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommandExt.java
index 6078180..7bf159b 100644
--- a/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommandExt.java
+++ b/core/src/main/java/flex/messaging/security/LoginCommandExt.java
@@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ public interface LoginCommandExt
/**
* Classes that implement the flex.messaging.security.LoginCommand
interface, should also
* implement this interface if the name stored in java.security.Principal
created as a result
- * of a succesfull authentication differs from the username that is
actually passed in to
+ * of a successful authentication differs from the username that is
actually passed in to
* the authentication.
*
- * Implementing this interace gives such LoginCommand's a chance to return
the resulting
+ * Implementing this interface gives such LoginCommand's a chance to
return the resulting
* username so that it can be compared to the one stored in Principal.
*
* Returns the value that would be returned by
java.security.Principal.getName() if
