wangyang0918 commented on pull request #38: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/38#issuecomment-1061607705
> @wangyang0918 We reconsidered the annotatiton approach based on feedback from @tweise and other problems with the busy reconcile loops due to status updates As for for the savepointGeneration semantics, indeed the increasing logic makes triggering slightly more difficult. I am not against making the check != instead. @morhidi wdyt? Just like @tweise has said, maybe `savepointGeneration` could be renamed to `triggerSavepointNonce`, the value is the `trigger-id`. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
