chaokunyang opened a new issue, #2552:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fory/issues/2552

   ### Feature Request
   
   Currently fory rust provide following deserialize API:
   ```rust
       pub fn deserialize<T: Serializer>(&self, bf: &[u8]) -> Result<T, Error> {
           let mut reader = Reader::new(bf);
           let meta_offset = self.read_head(&mut reader)?;
           let mut context = ReadContext::new(self, reader);
           if meta_offset > 0 {
               context.load_meta(meta_offset as usize);
           }
           <T as Serializer>::deserialize(&mut context)
       }
   ```
   
   
   It relies on compiler `Return Value Optimization (RVO)`, which won't work 
always. And the compiler will copy small struct always.
   
   ### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
   
   ` pub fn deserialize<T: Serializer>(&self, bf: &[u8]) -> Result<T, Error>` 
API may introduce extra copy.
   
   ### Describe the solution you'd like
   
   Add a new API to populate passed struct directly.
   
   ```rust
   pub fn deserialize_into<T: Serializer>(&self, bf: &[u8], output: &mut T) -> 
Result<(), Error> {
       let mut reader = Reader::new(bf);
       let meta_offset = self.read_head(&mut reader)?;
       let mut context = ReadContext::new(self, reader);
       if meta_offset > 0 {
           context.load_meta(meta_offset as usize);
       }
       <T as Serializer>::deserialize_into(&mut context, output)
   }
   ```
   
   ### Describe alternatives you've considered
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Additional context
   
   _No response_


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to