urlyy opened a new pull request, #3057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/fory/pull/3057

   <!--
   **Thanks for contributing to Apache Fory™.**
   
   **If this is your first time opening a PR on fory, you can refer to 
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/apache/fory/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).**
   
   Contribution Checklist
   
       - The **Apache Fory™** community has requirements on the naming of pr 
titles. You can also find instructions in 
[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/apache/fory/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md).
   
       - Apache Fory™ has a strong focus on performance. If the PR you submit 
will have an impact on performance, please benchmark it first and provide the 
benchmark result here.
   -->
   
   ## Why?
   Issue #3049 reveals a problem. For example, when serializing the field 
`my_vec: Vec<Wrapper<Inner>>`, the current Fory-Rust writes
   ```
   (id: Vec::type_id, generics: [
           ( id: Wrapper<Inner>::type_id, generics: [] )
   ])
   ```
   That is, the concrete generic type parameters on structs/enums are not 
written into the `FieldType` metadata. This results in inconsistent metadata 
between the sender and the receiver, and causes `assign_field_ids()` to assign 
`remote_field.field_id = -1`, leading to the issue.
   
   
   ## What does this PR do?
   When obtaining the field type on the sender side, for field_type 
`Vec<Wrapper<Inner>>`, the `FieldType` objects for `Vec` and `Wrapper<Inner>` 
have already been created, so there is no need to further create a `FieldType` 
object for `Inner`. Therefore, further recursion over generic types on 
structs/enums is truncated in the runtime.
   
   Meanwhile, because different languages provide different levels of support 
for generic types on classes, serializing structs/enums with generics is `not 
supported in xlang mode`. A `runtime check` has been added for this.
   
   
   ## Related issues
   Fixes #3049
   
   
   
   
   <!--
   When the PR has an impact on performance (if you don't know whether the PR 
will have an impact on performance, you can submit the PR first, and if it will 
have impact on performance, the code reviewer will explain it), be sure to 
attach a benchmark data here.
   
   Delete section if not applicable.
   -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to