commits  

Messages by Date

• 2024/11/23 [I] [Java] Type annotation hints for serialization [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/23 Re: [I] Deserialization creates duplicate instances [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/23 Re: [I] Deserialization creates duplicate instances [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/23 [I] Deserialization creates duplicate instances [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/23 Re: [I] Deserialization creates duplicate instances [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/23 Re: [I] Deserialization creates duplicate instances [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/22 Re: [I] [Question] <title>What does java.lang.RuntimeException: Deserialize failed, type of read objects are: [... [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/22 Re: [I] [Question] <title>What does java.lang.RuntimeException: Deserialize failed, type of read objects are: [... [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/22 Re: [I] [Question] <title>What does java.lang.RuntimeException: Deserialize failed, type of read objects are: [... [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/22 Re: [I] [Question] <title>What does java.lang.RuntimeException: Deserialize failed, type of read objects are: [... [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/22 Re: [I] [Question] <title>What does java.lang.RuntimeException: Deserialize failed, type of read objects are: [... [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/22 Re: [I] [Question] <title>What does java.lang.RuntimeException: Deserialize failed, type of read objects are: [... [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/22 Re: [I] [Question] <title>How does Fury perform in terms of speed and size when serializing and deserializing Java arrays? [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/22 Re: [I] [Question] <title>How does Fury perform in terms of speed and size when serializing and deserializing Java arrays? [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/21 Re: [I] [Question] <title>What does java.lang.RuntimeException: Deserialize failed, type of read objects are: [... [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/21 Re: [I] [Question] <title>What does java.lang.RuntimeException: Deserialize failed, type of read objects are: [... [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/21 Re: [I] [Question] <title>What does java.lang.RuntimeException: Deserialize failed, type of read objects are: [... [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/21 Re: [I] [Question] is content type defined and standardized? [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/21 [I] [Question] <title>What does java.lang.RuntimeException: Deserialize failed, type of read objects are: [... [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/21 Re: [PR] fix(java): fix find constructor error in generated serializer class caused by duplicated class classloading for Fury [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/21 Re: [I] [Question] is content type defined and standardized? [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/21 Re: [I] [Question] is content type defined and standardized? [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/21 Re: [I] Flink types serialization codegen error: no such constructor: org.apache.flink.table.data.binary.BinaryStringDataFuryCodec_0.<init>(Fury,Class)void/invokeSpecial [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/21 Re: [I] Flink types serialization codegen error: no such constructor: org.apache.flink.table.data.binary.BinaryStringDataFuryCodec_0.<init>(Fury,Class)void/invokeSpecial [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/21 (fury) branch main updated: fix(java): fix find constructor error in generated serializer class caused by duplicated class classloading for Fury (#1948) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/20 Re: [I] [Question] is content type defined and standardized? [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 Re: [I] [Java] Configurable buffer size limit [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 [I] [Question] <title>is content type defined and standardized? [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 [I] [Question] [Java]: Configurable buffer size limit [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 [I] Flink types serialization codegen error: no such constructor: org.apache.flink.table.data.binary.BinaryStringDataFuryCodec_0.<init>(Fury,Class)void/invokeSpecial [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2024/11/20 [PR] perf(python): Pre-allocate size for the dictionary [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/20 (fury) branch main updated: perf(python): Pre-allocate size for the dictionary (#1949) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/20 Re: [PR] perf(python): Pre-allocate size for the dictionary [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2024/11/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/20 [PR] fix(java): fix duplicate classloading in flink user classloader [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2024/11/20 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 Re: [I] [Python] Optimize collection serialization protocol by homogenization [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/20 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 Re: [PR] fix(java): ClassLoaderFuryPooled#setFactoryCallback cannot effect old Fury [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 (fury) branch main updated: fix(java): ClassLoaderFuryPooled#setFactoryCallback cannot effect old Fury (#1946) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 [PR] fix(java):ClassLoaderFuryPooled#setFactoryCallback cannot effect old Fury [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Lint PR" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Lint PR" is working again! GitBox
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] Could use Python bindings instead of Cython [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 (fury) branch main updated: fix(java): Move schema caching to unsafe trait to avoid issues when using non-inferred schema. (#1944) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/19 Re: [PR] fix(java): Move schema caching to unsafe trait to avoid issues when using non-inferred schema. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/19 Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/19 [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/18 [PR] fix(java): Move schema caching to unsafe trait to avoid issues when using non-inferred schema. [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/18 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/17 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/17 (fury) branch main updated: feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol (#1942) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/16 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/15 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/14 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/14 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/13 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/13 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/13 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/13 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/13 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/13 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/13 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/13 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/13 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/13 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/13 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/13 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/13 Re: [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/13 [I] [Java] ReplaceResolveSerializer circular references copy bug [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/12 [PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/12 Re: [PR] feat(python): guide cython to optimize code generation [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/11 Re: [I] `radial_scale` parameter of `actor.odf_slicer` has some issues [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/11 Re: [I] 【Java】remove guava jar reference [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/11 Re: [I] `radial_scale` parameter of `actor.odf_slicer` has some issues [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/11 Re: [PR] feat(java): add deserial object with feature deserializeNonexistentClassNotWriteFullClassInfo feature [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 Re: [I] `radial_scale` parameter of `actor.odf_slicer` has some issues [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 Re: [I] `radial_scale` parameter of `actor.odf_slicer` has some issues [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 Re: [I] `radial_scale` parameter of `actor.odf_slicer` has some issues [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 [I] `radial_scale` parameter of `actor.odf_slicer` has some issues [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 (fury-site) branch main updated: Update 2024-11-10-fury_0_9_0_release.md (#203) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/10 Re: [PR] Update 2024-11-10-fury_0_9_0_release.md [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 (fury-site) branch chaokunyang-patch-2 created (now a01cf73f) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/10 [PR] Update 2024-11-10-fury_0_9_0_release.md [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 (fury-site) branch chaokunyang-patch-2 deleted (was a01cf73f) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/10 (fury-site) 01/01: Update 2024-11-10-fury_0_9_0_release.md chaokunyang
• 2024/11/10 Re: [PR] Fix：CSS media queries solve mobile adaptation issues [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 (fury-site) branch main updated: Fix：CSS media queries solve mobile adaptation issues (#202) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/10 [PR] Fix：CSS media queries solve mobile adaptation issues [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 Re: [PR] Fix：SSR issue by wrapping client-side code with <BrowserOnly> in HomePageLanguageCard [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 (fury) branch main updated: chore: bump release version to 0.9.0 (#1940) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/10 (fury-site) branch main updated: 🔄 synced local 'docs/guide/' with remote 'docs/guide/' chaokunyang
• 2024/11/10 Re: [PR] chore: bump release version to 0.9.0 [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "❄️ Lint" is working again! GitBox
• 2024/11/10 Re: [PR] release fury 0.9.0 [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 Re: [PR] Fix：SSR issue by wrapping client-side code with <BrowserOnly> in HomePageLanguageCard [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 (fury-site) branch main updated: release fury 0.9.0 (#200) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/10 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "Deploy" is working again! GitBox
• 2024/11/10 Re: [I] [Site]: navigator break website build [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 [I] [Site]: navigator break website build [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "Deploy" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/10 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "Deploy" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/10 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "❄️ Lint" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/10 [PR] chore: bump release version to 0.9.0 [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "Deploy" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/10 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "❄️ Lint" is working again! GitBox
• 2024/11/10 [PR] release fury 0.9.0 [fury-site] via GitHub
• 2024/11/10 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "Deploy" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/10 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "Deploy" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/10 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "❄️ Lint" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/10 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "❄️ Lint" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/09 svn commit: r72932 - /dev/incubator/fury/0.9.0-rc2/ /release/incubator/fury/0.9.0/ chaokunyang
• 2024/11/09 (fury) tag v0.9.0 created (now bff814b1) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/09 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Publish Fury" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/08 Re: [PR] fix(java): update pom.xml to use javac 8 [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/08 [I] [Go] Schema evolution support for type backward/forward compatibility [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/07 [I] [Python] Schema evolution support for type backward/forward compatibility [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/07 [PR] 【Java】add deserial object with feature deserializeNonexistentClassNotWriteFullClassInfo feature [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/07 [I] 【Java】support deserialize object when none local class can deserializeNonexistentClassNotWriteFullClassInfo feature [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/07 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2024/11/07 Re: [PR] feat(java): add deserial object with feature deserializeNonexistentClassNotWriteFullClassInfo feature [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/07 Re: [PR] feat(java): add deserial object with feature deserializeNonexistentClassNotWriteFullClassInfo feature [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/07 Re: [PR] feat(java): add deserial object with feature deserializeNonexistentClassNotWriteFullClassInfo feature [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/07 [I] [Go] Optimize collection serialization protocol by homogenization #923 [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/07 [I] [Go] chunk based map predictive protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/07 [I] [Python][Protocol] Chunk by chunk predictive map serialization protocol [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/07 [I] [Python] Optimize collection serialization protocol by homogenization [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/07 (fury) branch main updated: perf(python): Improve tuple and list serializer performance (#1933) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/07 Re: [PR] perf(python): Improve tuple and list serializer performance [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/07 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Lint PR" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/07 Re: [PR] perf(python): Improve tuple and list serializer performance [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/07 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Lint PR" is working again! GitBox
• 2024/11/07 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Lint PR" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/07 Re: [PR] perf(python): Improve tuple and list serializer performance [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/07 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/07 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Lint PR" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/07 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/06 Re: [I] [GO] old data unable to unmarshal by new struct [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/06 Re: [I] [GO] old data unable to unmarshal by new struct [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/06 Re: [I] [GO] old data unable to unmarshal by new struct [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/06 [I] [GO] old data unable to unmarshal by new struct [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/05 (fury) branch main updated: fix(doc): set compressString default value to false (#1913) zhaommmmomo
• 2024/11/05 [GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "Deploy" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/05 (fury-site) branch main updated: 🔄 synced local 'docs/guide/' with remote 'docs/guide/' chaokunyang
• 2024/11/05 Re: [PR] fix(doc): set compressString default value to false [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/05 Re: [PR] fix(doc): set compressString default value to false [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/05 Re: [PR] fix(doc): set compressString default value to false [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/05 (fury) branch main updated: perf(python): Enhance the Python benchmark script (#1926) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/05 Re: [PR] perf(python): Enhance the Python benchmark script [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/05 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" is working again! GitBox
• 2024/11/05 [GH] (fury): Workflow run "Fury CI" failed! GitBox
• 2024/11/05 Re: [I] deserialize failed：After the class with the upstream system itself is serialized, the downstream system can not deserialize without the class object [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/05 Re: [PR] feat(java): ReplaceResolveSerializer deep copy [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/05 Re: [PR] feat(java): ReplaceResolveSerializer deep copy [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/05 Re: [PR] feat(java): ReplaceResolveSerializer deep copy [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/05 Re: [PR] feat(java): ReplaceResolveSerializer deep copy [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/05 Re: [PR] fix(doc): set compressString default value to false [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/05 Re: [I] deserialize failed：After the class with the upstream system itself is serialized, the downstream system can not deserialize without the class object [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/05 [I] After the class with the upstream system itself is serialized, the downstream system can not deserialize without the class object [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/05 Re: [PR] chore(ci): Migrate the ci from macOS 12 to macOS 13 [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/05 (fury) branch main updated: chore(ci): Migrate the ci from macOS 12 to macOS 13 (#1927) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/04 Re: [PR] perf(python): Enhance the Python benchmark script [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/04 [PR] chore(ci): Migrate the build from macOS 12 to macOS 13 [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/04 [PR] perf(python): Enhance the Python benchmark script [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/04 Re: [PR] feat(java): ReplaceResolveSerializer deep copy [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/04 Re: [PR] feat(java): ReplaceResolveSerializer deep copy [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/04 (fury) branch main updated: feat(java): ReplaceResolveSerializer deep copy (#1925) chaokunyang
• 2024/11/04 Re: [PR] feat(java): ReplaceResolveSerializer deep copy [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/04 Re: [PR] feat(java): ReplaceResolveSerializer deep copy [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/04 Re: [I] Are there any plans to support serialization of pyflink's Java and python inter-process communication? [fury] via GitHub
• 2024/11/03 [PR] feat(java): ReplaceResolveSerializer deep copy [fury] via GitHub

• Later messages