hyandell opened a new issue, #1635:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-fury/issues/1635

   ### Search before asking
   
   - [X] I had searched in the 
[issues](https://github.com/apache/incubator-fury/issues) and found no similar 
issues.
   
   
   ### Version
   
   0.5.0 - 
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/fury/fury-core/0.5.0/fury-core-0.5.0-javadoc.jar
   
   ### Component(s)
   
   Java
   
   ### Minimal reproduce step
   
   Hi there from the ASF Legal Committee side of the house (though this came up 
initially at work) :)
   
   The javadoc jar has an Oracle Proprietary license in legal/LICENSE - "Oracle 
No-Fee Terms and Conditions (NFTC)". This should not be in there, and neither 
(perhaps) should any content it relates to. I see the following on files within 
the documentation jar:
   
   - ./link.svg: ORACLE PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to license 
terms.
   - ./copy.svg: ORACLE PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to license 
terms.
   - ./script.js: * ORACLE PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to license 
terms.
   - ./search-page.js: * ORACLE PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to 
license terms.
   - ./search.js: * ORACLE PROPRIETARY/CONFIDENTIAL. Use is subject to license 
terms.
   
   From initial inspection, I don't see how it gets there. It's not in the 
GitHub source. I've looked at the 0.5.1 draft release, but I don't see a 
javadoc jar there to review. 
   
   I'm definitely interested if this is something being introduced by an Oracle 
JDK. We knew that they were injecting other open source licenses (see: 
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#from-java-9-onwards-javadoc-can-include-search-functionality-that-includes-javascript-under-other-open-source-licenses-can-apache-projects-include-this-javadoc
 ) but this is the first time I've seen proprietary potentially injected. 
Perhaps it comes down to the JVM/JDK used to make the release and we need rules 
about that.
   
   ### What did you expect to see?
   
   That an Apache release did not include proprietary licensing.
   
   ### What did you see instead?
   
   :)
   
   ### Anything Else?
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Are you willing to submit a PR?
   
   - [ ] I'm willing to submit a PR!


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to