Messages by Thread
-
-
Re: [D] How to provide a custom string ID for class registration rather than int ID? [fury]
via GitHub
-
(fury) branch main updated: feat(java): configurable buffer size limit (#1963)
chaokunyang
-
Re: [I] [Scala] Expose register on ThreadSafeFury [fury]
via GitHub
-
[PR] fix(java): Fix flakiness in ExpressionVisitorTest#testTraverseExpression [fury]
via GitHub
-
[I] [Python] support latin1/utf16 encoding for python string [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Scala] support default not-null value in COMPATIBLE mode. [fury]
via GitHub
-
[I] [Kotlin] Kotlin default value support in CompatibleMode [fury]
via GitHub
-
(fury-site) branch main updated: Update companies.json
chaokunyang
-
(fury-site) branch main updated: add quarkus adrestus (#204)
chaokunyang
-
[PR] add quarkus adrestus [fury-site]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] How to register a custom serializer with ThreadSafeFury? [fury]
via GitHub
-
[I] [C++] To support the utf8 utf16 and using simd to accelerate the optimization [fury]
via GitHub
-
[PR] feat(java): configurable buffer size limit [fury]
via GitHub
-
(fury) branch main updated: feat(java): use varint for jdk compatible serializers (#1960)
chaokunyang
-
(fury) branch main updated: chore(Rust): fix lint problems (#1962)
chaokunyang
-
[PR] chore(Rust): fix lint problems [fury]
via GitHub
-
[I] Fury Rust compile error [fury]
via GitHub
-
[PR] feat(java): use varint for jdk compatible serializers [fury]
via GitHub
-
[I] When using `buildThreadSafeFuryPool(10, 60)` for init ThreadSafePool, the following exception occurs: [fury]
via GitHub
-
[I] [Question] <title>Can MemoryBuffer achieve a smaller size than arrays? Does it support automatic garbage collection? Is there documentation for using MemoryBuffer? [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] <title>When I serialize this object, enough space is allocated, but it still throws a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] <title>When I serialize this object, enough space is allocated, but it still throws a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] <title>When I serialize this object, enough space is allocated, but it still throws a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] <title>When I serialize this object, enough space is allocated, but it still throws a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] <title>When I serialize this object, enough space is allocated, but it still throws a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] <title>When I serialize this object, enough space is allocated, but it still throws a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] <title>When I serialize this object, enough space is allocated, but it still throws a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] <title>When I serialize this object, enough space is allocated, but it still throws a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] <title>When I serialize this object, enough space is allocated, but it still throws a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] <title>When I serialize this object, enough space is allocated, but it still throws a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] Who is Using Apache Fury? [fury]
via GitHub
-
[I] [RFC] Remove pyfury python implementation, use pure cython only [fury]
via GitHub
-
[I] [Java] Type annotation hints for serialization [fury]
via GitHub
-
[I] Deserialization creates duplicate instances [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] <title>How does Fury perform in terms of speed and size when serializing and deserializing Java arrays? [fury]
via GitHub
-
[I] [Question] <title>What does java.lang.RuntimeException: Deserialize failed, type of read objects are: [... [fury]
via GitHub
-
(fury) branch main updated: fix(java): fix find constructor error in generated serializer class caused by duplicated class classloading for Fury (#1948)
chaokunyang
-
[I] [Question] <title>is content type defined and standardized? [fury]
via GitHub
-
[I] [Question] [Java]: Configurable buffer size limit [fury]
via GitHub
-
[I] Flink types serialization codegen error: no such constructor: org.apache.flink.table.data.binary.BinaryStringDataFuryCodec_0.<init>(Fury,Class)void/invokeSpecial [fury]
via GitHub
-
[PR] perf(python): Pre-allocate size for the dictionary [fury]
via GitHub
-
(fury) branch main updated: perf(python): Pre-allocate size for the dictionary (#1949)
chaokunyang
-
[PR] fix(java): fix duplicate classloading in flink user classloader [fury]
via GitHub
-
(fury) branch main updated: fix(java): ClassLoaderFuryPooled#setFactoryCallback cannot effect old Fury (#1946)
chaokunyang
-
[PR] fix(java):ClassLoaderFuryPooled#setFactoryCallback cannot effect old Fury [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] Could use Python bindings instead of Cython [fury]
via GitHub
-
(fury) branch main updated: fix(java): Move schema caching to unsafe trait to avoid issues when using non-inferred schema. (#1944)
chaokunyang
-
[I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] [Question] For the Java PB object generated by Protobuf, the serialization and deserialization using Fury are slower than using Protobuf. [fury]
via GitHub
-
[PR] fix(java): Move schema caching to unsafe trait to avoid issues when using non-inferred schema. [fury]
via GitHub
-
(fury) branch main updated: feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol (#1942)
chaokunyang
-
[I] [Java] ReplaceResolveSerializer circular references copy bug [fury]
via GitHub
-
[PR] feat(python): Implement collection serialization protocol [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [PR] feat(python): guide cython to optimize code generation [fury]
via GitHub
-
Re: [I] 【Java】remove guava jar reference [fury]
via GitHub
-
[I] `radial_scale` parameter of `actor.odf_slicer` has some issues [fury]
via GitHub
-
(fury-site) branch main updated: Update 2024-11-10-fury_0_9_0_release.md (#203)
chaokunyang
-
(fury-site) branch chaokunyang-patch-2 created (now a01cf73f)
chaokunyang
-
[PR] Update 2024-11-10-fury_0_9_0_release.md [fury-site]
via GitHub
-
(fury-site) branch chaokunyang-patch-2 deleted (was a01cf73f)
chaokunyang
-
(fury-site) branch main updated: Fix:CSS media queries solve mobile adaptation issues (#202)
chaokunyang
-
[PR] Fix:CSS media queries solve mobile adaptation issues [fury-site]
via GitHub
-
(fury) branch main updated: chore: bump release version to 0.9.0 (#1940)
chaokunyang
-
[GH] (fury): Workflow run "❄️ Lint" is working again!
GitBox
-
Re: [PR] Fix:SSR issue by wrapping client-side code with <BrowserOnly> in HomePageLanguageCard [fury-site]
via GitHub
-
(fury-site) branch main updated: release fury 0.9.0 (#200)
chaokunyang
-
[GH] (fury-site): Workflow run "Deploy" is working again!
GitBox
-
[I] [Site]: navigator break website build [fury-site]
via GitHub
-
[GH] (fury): Workflow run "❄️ Lint" failed!
GitBox