Re: [I] [Bug report] list-table api is very slow when table quantity is very large [gravitino]

Sun, 07 Jul 2024 20:15:17 -0700 


mchades commented on issue #4089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/issues/4089#issuecomment-2212905337

   > <img alt="image" width="1081" 
src="https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/4070282/346411226-e73d8f80-a88e-40cd-8e42-0aafe1d27343.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.xvWkcpBttbXJuY1NFOnObZ0P6NZM30g5RyfRNsIik2k";>
   > I have tryed the listTableNamesByFilter inteface to filter iceberg 
table。It is a feasible approach. but I did not pay attention to filter the 
manager and external table，I dont know the point of filtering manager and 
external table.
   > 
   > so, please check this way. if it is acceptable ,I can submit a pr.
   
   Great! I think we can work on this way. WDYT? @jerryshao @FANNG1 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to