xunliu commented on PR #4515:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/4515#issuecomment-2295560694

   > I found that there are differences between the construction the ranger 
policy and our implementation.
   > 
   > If the policyName is `roleName + securableObjectFullName`, it's possible 
that there will be many policies for the same resource, which seems unnecessary.
   > 
   > In our system, each policy corresponds to a single resource, and the 
policy is named based on the resource name. Within Ranger, we create roles in 
ranger, instead of putting the role in the policyName, we will put the role and 
role privileges into policyItems.
   
   hi @lw-yang 
   So does Gravitino.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to