jerqi commented on PR #6849:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/6849#issuecomment-2801585999

   > > Is `GVFS` suitable to put in the client module? cc @diqiu50 Maybe we 
should have the document about fuse, too.
   > 
   > Currently, 'GVFS' is relocated to `catalogs/fileset/gvfs`, next to 
`catalogs/fileset/hadoop`. If we have client side module(s), we may want to put 
it under `client/`. As always, all kinds of suggestions/ideas are welcomed. For 
example, maybe treating `gvfs` as a fileset variant is not good, there is a 
better home for it?
   
   
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/22c0640a-8273-4bd3-9d55-38ca303be7a0)
   
   This is GVFS client code. For me GVFS is a implementation of the client 
instead of server side. It wrapped the Gravitino client and hide the 
communication with Gravitino server. And then it implemented the Hadoop 
Filesystem interface. Maybe others can give another suggestion.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@gravitino.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to