jerryshao commented on PR #12257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/12257#issuecomment-5238010071

   > Should V2 use a soft-delete model that is initially delivered only for 
Iceberg tables through
   IRC, but can be extended to other supported object types through later, 
separately reviewed
   work?
   Should durable deletion, recovery, retention, and audit metadata remain a 
clean, separate
   lifecycle model rather than being combined with purge-worker execution state 
in
   iceberg_cleanup_job?
   
   Yes for both. But I don't think the doc change reflects the questions we 
left before.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to