nevzheng opened a new issue, #13110:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/issues/13110

   ### What would you like to be improved?
   
   #12728 set two conditions for omitting stack traces from error responses 
(https://github.com/apache/gravitino/issues/12728#issuecomment-5531267707 by 
@markhoerth):
   
   1. When the stack is omitted from the response, it must be logged 
server-side at the point the exception is mapped.
   2. The log line and the response carry a shared request ID, so a user report 
can be tied to the server log entry.
   
   #13057 makes stack traces configurable and adds server-side logging on some 
paths (unexpected authentication failures, the authorization path), but it does 
not deliver either condition in full, and nothing tracks them yet.
   
   It is not yet clear whether Gravitino supports request IDs or log 
correlation today. A search of `server`, `server-common` and `core` main code 
found no request ID in error responses and no MDC-based log correlation.
   
   ### How should we improve?
   
   Open questions for triage:
   
   - Does Gravitino already have, or want, a per-request ID (for example an 
`X-Request-Id` header) that can appear in both the error response and the log 
line?
   - Which error paths should log the underlying exception when the stack is 
omitted? Paths noted during #13057 that currently don't log it include the 
Jersey 4xx exception mappers (JSON parse/mapping, not found, parameter, 
`WebApplicationException`), the `VersioningFilter` 406, and the known-exception 
branches of `LanceExceptionMapper`.
   - Should this be solved per server, or together with the error-mapping 
discussion in #13107?
   
   Related: #12728, #13057, #13107.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to