[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nick Couchman updated GUACAMOLE-300:
------------------------------------
    Affects Version/s:     (was: 0.9.12-incubating)

> Support posixGroup in LDAP Authentication and Group-based Session Admission
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GUACAMOLE-300
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-300
>             Project: Guacamole
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: guacamole-auth-ldap
>         Environment: Oracle Solaris 11.3.19.5.0, Apache Tomcat 8.5.9, 
> OpenLDAP 2.4.30, LDAP users are organized using the posixGroup scheme.
>            Reporter: Steffen Moser
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LDAP-posixGroup-support_SteffenMoser-20170514.patch
>
>
> Recently, the auth-ldap module was extended by the ability to grant access to 
> remote terminal connections based on existing LDAP groups using the seeAlso 
> attribute in Guacamole's LDAP-based configuration settings. This is a great 
> feature if you've to manage a lot of users which are already organized in 
> LDAP groups. It works well as long as the groups are of the scheme 
> groupOfNames. As we have decided for posixGroup (due to other tools' 
> requirements), we currently cannot use the feature and still have to list all 
> users individually in the Guacamole remote service configuration. While this 
> could be scripted easily, it is still a work-around which makes the 
> administration work unnecessarily complex.
> A better solution would be to support both schemes, posixGroup and 
> groupOfNames. 
> The attached patch will extend the user lookup code by the ability to search 
> not only through the groupOfNames but also through the posixGroup scheme. The 
> piece of code seems to work with both schemes in my tests successfully, I am 
> not sure if there are any pitfalls when just combining the possible results. 
> Maybe introducing a configuration flag to choose whether searching posixGroup 
> or groupOfNames would be a better approach.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to