[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16452649#comment-16452649
]
Michael Jumper commented on GUACAMOLE-551:
------------------------------------------
No, if a frame has an out-of-order timestamp, the contents of that frame will
still be rendered, they'll just get picked up in the next frame. This wouldn't
result in a difference in video duration. At worst this would result in some
data being visible slightly earlier/later, but for there to be enough
contention between the two threads that two timestamps are written out of
order, the difference in time already has to be negligible. I don't believe
this can result in a perceptible difference in output quality.
When I encode the provided [^MJ.1], I don't get 2 seconds of video; I get 15
seconds. According to the timestamps within the recording itself, that is the
correct video length. It doesn't look like there is a problem here.
Are you sure you're a guacenc built from the latest source?
> guacenc warning "Layer index out of bounds: -1"
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GUACAMOLE-551
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-551
> Project: Guacamole
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: guacamole-server
> Affects Versions: 0.9.14
> Reporter: Manjeeta Raj
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: MJ.1, MJ.1.m4v, MJ.m4v, command.png, recording.1
>
>
> guacenc instruction throws a warning of "Layer index out of bounds: -1" for
> a recorded file "sudo guacenc /path/to/recording/recordingfilename". This
> issue was raised before too and says its fixed, for which link is attached
> below. Attaching the recorded file as well.
>
> [https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-307?attachmentSortBy=fileName|http://example.com]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
