Adam Thorn created GUACAMOLE-243:
------------------------------------

             Summary: ldap auth fails when search results include an LDAP 
referral
                 Key: GUACAMOLE-243
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-243
             Project: Guacamole
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: guacamole-auth-ldap
            Reporter: Adam Thorn


The ldap search in 
extensions/guacamole-auth-ldap/src/main/java/org/apache/guacamole/auth/ldap/user/UserService.java
 to find the DN of the user who is logging in (i.e. inside getUserDNs() ) fails 
if the LDAPSearchResults include an LDAP referral, because 
LDAPSearchResults.next() throws an LDAPReferralException:

https://www.novell.com/documentation/developer/jldap/jldapenu/api/com/novell/ldap/LDAPSearchResults.html#next()

This particularly affects Active Directory, where typically the LDAP 
implementation has separate partitions for DNS zones and Configuration (see 
e.g. 
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32989159/ldapsearch-entire-active-directory-without-refldap-returns
 for an example of the three LDAP referrals that AD returns). Empirically, 
against my AD, even when an ldap search for (sAMAccountName=$USERNAME) 
correctly returns the dn for the searched-for $USERNAME , I still also get the 
three ldap referrals mentioned in that stackoverflow post. Thus, even though 
the first result in the LDAPSearchResults has the correct dn for the user 
logging in, results.next() then throws an exception when it encounters the 
referral and the login fails.

This only happens when ldap-user-base-dn is set to the base dn of my AD (i.e. 
with dc=example,dc=com I get referrals, but with ou=Users,dc=example,dc=com as 
the search base I do not). The structure of my AD requires me to set the base 
dn as the search base, though.

N.B. A possible workaround is to explicitly query the Global Catalog (by 
setting ldap-port: 3268). However, that performs a forest-wide search rather 
than just a domain-wide search, which might not be desired.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to