[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16016827#comment-16016827
]
Kurt Kellner commented on GUACAMOLE-305:
----------------------------------------
Is this true of the "Active Sessions" code as well? I'm assuming there is a
in-memory HashMap that is holding this data as there isn't a MySQL table for
Active Sessions.
> Use of LDAP for users/connection should not prevent Active Sessions and
> History
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GUACAMOLE-305
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-305
> Project: Guacamole
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.9.12-incubating
> Reporter: Kurt Kellner
> Priority: Minor
>
> If users and connections are defined within LDAP the negative impact is that
> session are not logged in "History" records or show any "Active Sessions" in
> the Guacamole settings area.
> I assume this because of referential integrity within MySQL (e.g., if there
> is no user or connection record within MySQL, the history table can't hold
> the record). As LDAP becomes more popular as a store of users/connections
> need to figure out a way to enable the Active sessions and History
> functionality. Maybe the data should just be inserted with username and
> connection name.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
