This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

dependabot[bot] pushed a change to branch 
dependabot/maven/lib/org.eclipse.jetty-jetty-server-12.1.10
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/hop.git


 discard a687480583 Bump org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server from 12.1.7 to 12.1.10 
in /lib
     add 72b68be2eb issue #4366: Bug fix in transform Formula (#7606)
     add 6def82087b Bump org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-util from 12.1.7 to 12.1.9 in 
/lib (#7615)
     add 5032d6444b Bump com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core from 2.21.1 to 
2.21.4 (#7614)
     add 5af79a8853 Bump org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-server from 12.1.9 to 12.1.10 
in /lib

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions.
That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the
branch are not in the new version.  This situation occurs
when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository
containing something like this:

 * -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O   (a687480583)
            \
             N -- N -- N   
refs/heads/dependabot/maven/lib/org.eclipse.jetty-jetty-server-12.1.10 
(5af79a8853)

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O
revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions
from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omit" are not gone; other references still
refer to them.  Any revisions marked "discard" are gone forever.

No new revisions were added by this update.

Summary of changes:
 .../transforms/0042-formula-high-field-count.hpl   | 428 +++++++++++++++++++++
 .../main-0042-formula-high-field-count.hwf}        |  93 +++--
 lib/pom.xml                                        |   2 +-
 .../transforms/formula/util/FormulaParser.java     |   6 +-
 pom.xml                                            |   2 +-
 5 files changed, 477 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 
integration-tests/transforms/0042-formula-high-field-count.hpl
 copy integration-tests/{logging/main-001-fail-pipeline-log.hwf => 
transforms/main-0042-formula-high-field-count.hwf} (80%)

Reply via email to