[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
leesf updated HUDI-285:
-----------------------
Description:
Currently the _getStorageWriter_ method in HoodieStorageWriterFactory to get
HoodieStorageWriter is hard code to HoodieParquetWriter since currently only
parquet is supported for HoodieStorageWriter. However, it is better to
implement HoodieStorageWriter based on actual file type for extension.
cc [~vinoth] [~vbalaji]
was:
Currently the _getStorageWriter_ method in HoodieStorageWriterFactory to get
HoodieStorageWriter is hard code to HoodieParquetWriter since currently only
parquet is supported for HoodieStorageWriter. However, it is better to
implement HoodieStorageWriter based on the metadata for extension. And if
_StorageWriterType_ is emtpy in metadata, the default HoodieParquetWriter is
returned to not affect the current logic.
cc [~vinoth] [~vbalaji]
> Implement HoodieStorageWriter based on actual file type
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HUDI-285
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-285
> Project: Apache Hudi (incubating)
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Write Client
> Reporter: leesf
> Assignee: leesf
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.5.1
>
>
> Currently the _getStorageWriter_ method in HoodieStorageWriterFactory to get
> HoodieStorageWriter is hard code to HoodieParquetWriter since currently only
> parquet is supported for HoodieStorageWriter. However, it is better to
> implement HoodieStorageWriter based on actual file type for extension.
> cc [~vinoth] [~vbalaji]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
